1

Some time ago, I heard the pronunciation of the word peripheral on a TV show (Brain Games, to be exact). Very surprised to hear /pəɹɪfəɹəl/, I asked two close relatives whether that was how the word should really be said, in their opinion. They asked, "How else would you say it?"

Apparently, my pronunciation of /pəɹ.ɪ.fɹiəl/ doesn't exist in any dictionary and the closest I could find was one on Wiktionary, /pəɹɪfiəl/ with no ar. It makes sense etymologically: the word is a form of periphery with the suffix -al added.

My questions: is this pronunciation widespread? Is it a form some consider archaic, such as rooves (which I also use)? Do you think it's just a solecism that came about by analogy with periphery?

5
  • 1
    I don't read IPA (and can't find a functioning pronouncer anywhere), but Merriam-Webster provides an IPA of \pə-ˈri-f(ə-)rəl\ and pronounces it pretty much as I would, only a hair stilted.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:16
  • 2
    (I gather the main difference you're focusing on is "fer" vs "fre". I don't recall ever hearing the word credibly pronounced with "fre".)
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:19
  • 1
    I don't read IPA too good either (we're the blind leading the blind here! :) But the guy doing the talking on that MW page does seem to be somewhat "over-enunciating", and I note that the IPA rendition is \pə-ˈri-f(ə-)rəl** (i.e. - the schwa between /f/ and /r/ is effectively "optional"). In practice, I wouldn't normally enunciate it myself, so **peripheral usually has only three syllables for me. On the other hand, I'd nearly always enunciate the corresponding element in periphery, so that one invariably has four syllables. As you can see, consistency is not my strong suit! Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:39
  • What exactly are you asking? "Is this pronunciation widespread?" Which this? yours or MW or Brain Games or what? Which one are you possibly calling the solecism?
    – Mitch
    Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 23:07

2 Answers 2

4

I think most people would consider the pronunciation /pəˈrɪfriəl/ "puh-RIF-ri-al" for peripheral nonstandard, for several reasons. Like you, I was unable to find any dictionary that lists it, or any other evidence that it is used by people other than you. It also doesn't match up with the spelling.

The ending -eral is normally pronounced as /ərəl/ or /rəl/). There is generally no stress on the vowel "e" here, and it is often dropped entirely in the pronunciation (examples: general, several, ephemeral, pronounced with /ərəl/ or /rəl/). It generally cannot be pronounced as /əriəl/ or /riəl/.

While a lack of agreement with the spelling doesn't always cause a pronunciation to be considered incorrect (there are words like marriage and carriage where an "i" is written but generally not pronounced), in many cases it does (as in "mischievious" for mischievous, or "grievious" for grievous). I don't remember hearing this pronunciation before, but it seems wrong to me because of this sound-spelling mismatch.

If we do vary the spelling, I found that Oxford Dictionaries does list a variant /ˌpɛrᵻˈfɪərɪəl/ (that's perry-FEAR-ial, so not quite the same pronunciation) that is spelled peripherial. They note it to be rare; the spelling definitely is (see this Ngram, courtesy of Fumblefingers' comment). But apparently, this form actually is older than the form peripheral. So your pronunciation doesn't seem to be archaic, but your inclusion of the -y/-i- before the ending -al is. The adjective peripheral is definitely formed in an unusual way; I haven't been able to find any other adjective ending in -eral that corresponds to a noun ending in -ery. But despite this, it has become the standard form used today.

If we look at the pronunciation of some currently-used words that end in -erial, we can see that they generally display the same stress shift: the adjectives corresponding to artery, ministry, matter and manager are arterial, ministerial, material and managerial, all pronounced with /ˈɪəriəl/.

And expanding to look at other words ending in the sound /riəl/, a vowel letter before it always seems to be stressed, never dropped (see janitorial, adversarial, tenurial). There is a word /ˈfɪmbriəl/ where /riəl/ comes after a consonant (so it has the same phonetic structure as your pronunciation /pə⁠ˈrɪfriəl/), but it is spelled fimbrial, not *fimberal (or even *fimberial), and the corresponding noun is fimbria /ˈfɪmbriə/ not *fimbery /ˈfɪmbəri/.

So even if you spell the word peripherial, /pəˈrɪfriəl/ would still be an odd pronunciation. Of course, it's up to you whether you want to change your pronunciation to the more usual one, or stick with your accustomed mumpsimus.

18
  • Thank you so much for your answer! With this, I wouldn't say the spelling differs too much from the pronunciation (it appears like a dropped schwa), but the original pronunciation and mine do differ. You've given me hope and a new spelling I will use. Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:40
  • I can't go with this. Bearing in mind that a solecism is a phrase that trespasses the rules of grammar, it doesn't really seem at all appropriate. But even if we stretch the meaning a bit (so it can include "mispronunciations"), it doesn't work for me. Partly because per M-W's phonetic transcription the middle schwa is "optional", but mainly because if we had to make our pronunciation consistent with spelling, practically everything Anglophones currently say would be "wrong". Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:47
  • 2
    @FumbleFingers: thanks for the link; I modified my wording to "non-standard." The middle schwa being optional didn't seem to me to be the main point of the OP's question; I thought it was mainly about the inclusion of an /i/ directly before the /əl/. There's a difference between /pəˈɹɪfɹəl/, which does seem to be recorded in dictionaries, and /pəˈɹɪfɹiəl/, which doesn't.
    – herisson
    Commented Dec 16, 2015 at 22:58
  • 1
    @WhiteHatHacker I'm rereading all that you've written and I don't see this 'at least one other person'. Who is it again?
    – Mitch
    Commented Dec 17, 2015 at 1:09
  • 1
    @WhiteHatHacker You need to do more thorough research before making inferences. All those instances through Google Books (or through regular Google search) are 1) written and 2) accompanied in a following or previous sentence where it is spelled 'peripheral'. I take that unconscionable variance to be a typo.
    – Mitch
    Commented Dec 17, 2015 at 2:10
1

Most people say BrE /pᵻˈrɪf(ə)rəl/ , /pᵻˈrɪf(ə)rl̩/ , AmE /pəˈrɪf(ə)rəl/

There is an entry in the OED for 'peripherial' as an alternate for peripheral.

It is labeled 'rare' and is given the pronunciation BrE /ˌpɛrᵻˈfɪərɪəl/, AmE /ˌpɛrəˈfɪriəl/

You may well have seen one of the rare occurrences of 'peripherial' and that's where you came up with the pronunciation that doesn't match what the others around you use.

Because it is labeled rare in the OED I'd suggest that you use the more common pronunciation. In the links you gave, every time I see 'peripherial', even when repeated, it just looks a typo.

1
  • haha...now that I read sumelic's answer again, I realize he found the same thing, so my answer is superfluous.
    – Mitch
    Commented Dec 17, 2015 at 3:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .