9

I don't see which one is fits best:

it is awesome because you can do it without needing to send e-mails

or

it is awesome because you can do it without the need of sending e-mails

Also, are both correct or just one (or none...)?

1
  • 2
    Both are grammatically correct, I think, but I'd reject both and use "... you can do it without sending e-mails". Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 4:14

2 Answers 2

8

The first one is correct. The second one can be corrected as:

It is awesome because you can do it without the need to send emails.

6
  • 3
    A gerundophile could also say …without the need for sending e-mails.
    – choster
    Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 0:48
  • @choster of course! I'm so embarrassed. (._.) Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 0:50
  • 1
    need of sending is OK, too. Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 0:55
  • 3
    My new word of the day: gerundophile. I am loving it.
    – JAM
    Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 1:25
  • @John Lawler - Why are "need of sending" and "need to send" both correct?
    – user19148
    Commented Jul 13, 2012 at 1:55
2

Here are two samples where "without the need of", not "to", is used:

  • Apple's AirPlay May Soon Work Without The Need Of A Wifi Network
  • TAX REFUNDS: Income Tax refunds will be devoted each year, as periodic payments, to the plan’s funding until plan completion. The tender of such payments shall deem the plan modified by such amount, increasing the base thereby without the need of further notice, hearing or Court order. In [sic] need be for the use by debtor(s) of a portion of such refund, debtor(s) shall seek Court’s authorization prior to any use of funds.
    Source

I guess it's a matter of whether you use a verb or a noun after the phrase:

  • without the need to + verb
  • without the need for + noun

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .