John Knight, who/whom I spoke to yesterday, seemed to be rather irritable.

In this sentence, John Knight is an object because I (the subject) am speaking to him; however, he is also a subject since he is performing an action, which in this case, is being irritable. Is he both a subject and an object? If not, which one of these is he?

Furthermore, which is correct: who or whom?

  • 1
    John Knight is subject of "seemed". It is also the antecedent to "who(m)", which is object complement of the preposition "to" in the relative clause. In that respect, John Knight plays two roles: subject and antecedent, which I think is what you're getting at. – BillJ Mar 18 '18 at 18:19


The same word cannot be doing two different jobs at once.

John Knight, who/whom I spoke to yesterday, seemed to be rather irritable.

Your thesis that John Knight is “both” a subject and an object here is where you’ve gone wrong. Your syntactic analysis is off, in that it isn’t ever an object here. It is only the subject, the subject of the verb seem.

In contrast, the subject of your subordinate clause is I and the object is the relative pronoun who/whom.

Which provides you your answer: it should “really” be whom in careful speech and writing, since it’s the object not the subject. This “really” bit is that this is a “rule” that not all native speakers and writers are aware of — or even if they are aware of, choose to follow.

  • Oeuf corse. I agree completely. – Lambie Mar 18 '18 at 16:35
  • Sort of. Sit yourself down. – Will Crawford Mar 18 '18 at 17:48
  • How about "I told John yesterday when John was working." Isn't John both an object and a subject in this sentence? – Zebrafish Mar 20 '18 at 13:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy