1

Does it sound strange to say "An emergency meeting is expected to be held soon." or "The new highway is proposed to be built across the swamp." Should we avoid this type of construction ?

1
  • 1
    The only reason I'd avoid the second sentence is because of the ambiguity. Does it mean that the new highway will actually cross over the swamp or that it will be built on the other side of the swamp?
    – Jim
    Commented Jul 16, 2014 at 4:04

2 Answers 2

7

No, there is no reason to avoid those sentences.

It is often simpler and clearer to use the active voice than the passive voice. And the active voice is especially helpful when the agent of the action is important to the message. Otherwise, the passive voice is alive and well, and there is no reason to fear it blindly.

It's all about deciding what your message is and then finding a clear way to get it across. And in that quest it is important to consider your audience or readers. In some contexts they might well expect and appreciate the passive voice.

1
  • 2
    Agree; in the examples shown, the active voice would require specifying the agent(s), which is sometimes unwanted. "<Someone> expects that <someone> will hold an emergency meeting soon", or "<Someone> has proposed that <someone> build a new highway across the swamp" - very awkward. Commented Jul 16, 2014 at 4:20
5

If passive voice does not bother you, you don't need to worry about using this construction.

If passive voice does bother you, don't use it twice in one sentence unless the alternative is more awkward.

The question of doubly passive sentences is essentially the same as the question of any passive sentences. Sometimes passive voice conveys the meaning better, and sometimes it is just needlessly evasive or bland.

The sentences you've posted seem normal enough that they wouldn't stand out in conversation.

2
  • 1
    Right on. Doubling can be useful, as anything parallel can. And Passive is useful for all kinds of things. However, since the only thing you can do with an emergency meeting is to hold it, I don't see why that last clause is needed at all: An emergency meeting is expected soon does the trick nicely. Commented Jul 16, 2014 at 2:37
  • @JohnLawler A meeting can also be cancelled or postponed but your sentence certainly sounds unambiguous.
    – Centaurus
    Commented Jul 16, 2014 at 14:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .