24

I never really gave a deep thought at this but recently a teacher of talked about language and there was an implicit question in it. something like there is a difference between "rather than" and "instead of" in usage. do you know it??

please help and explain with a few examples.

  • is there any considerable difference if not a mere nuance?????????? it is toiling with my mind. – vickyace Apr 16 '14 at 0:20
30

Let's try some minimal pairs:

  • I walk rather than run
  • I walk instead of running

  • I eat apples rather than oranges

  • I eat apples instead of oranges

  • I walk quickly instead of quietly

  • I walk quickly rather than quietly

I don't really think there's much of a difference, except perhaps rather than implies preference whereas instead of implies substitution. But that might be nitpicking. And it doesn't seem to apply when using it to coordinate adverbs (last pair).

Also, there's a slight difference in the verb forms in the first pair, but there's not really a difference in meaning there.

  • 3
    bingo. the "substitution" and "preference" thing will do just fine. you are right about the adverb part, as in invest in machinery rather than/instead of buildings. – vickyace Apr 16 '14 at 2:43
  • Nice explanation. Your answer deserves one more +1 – starkeen Mar 4 at 5:58
3

"Rather than" is coordinating. "Instead of" is subordinating. As the above examples indicate, while the distinction when it's a matter of nouns or adverbs might be moot, the verb forms on either side of "rather than" are the same, while "instead of" takes a participle. Getting them mixed up in formal writing could easily confuse a reader about the nuances of the argument.

  • 4
    You really cannot get away with talking about the examples above, since that assumes a presentation order that is prone to fluctuation. But if you are commenting on someone else’s posting, then you are not answering the question. Your own answer should not require the existence of another answer, let alone of ordering. Your answer should be able to stand on its own merits without needing to reference another answer; just think, what happens if that other answer goes away? – tchrist Sep 3 '14 at 2:18

protected by tchrist Mar 1 '15 at 18:17

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.