Yes, there are a few derivational prefixes whose application does change
the base word class (part of speech, syntactic category) to a different
derived word class.
Prefix |
Base class |
Derived class |
Examples |
en‑ |
noun |
verb |
encase, encode, enslave, entomb, enveil, envenon |
en‑ |
adjective |
verb |
enable, enfeeble, enlarge, endear, enrich |
em‑ |
noun |
verb |
embalm, embattle, embed, empanel, emplace, empower |
em‑ |
adjective |
verb |
embitter |
e‑ |
noun |
verb |
elapse |
a‑ |
noun |
adverb |
abloom, aboard, abreast, across, afield, akin |
a‑ |
adjective |
adverb |
afresh, afoul, around, astray, awry |
be‑ |
noun |
verb |
befriend, bewitch, bedevil |
be‑ |
adjective |
verb |
becalm, belittle |
de‑ |
noun |
verb |
debrief, decamp, defraud, delouse, deplane, dethrone |
un‑ |
noun |
verb |
uncloak, unhorse, unman, unmask, unseat, unveil |
up‑ |
noun |
adverb |
upstage, upstairs, upwind |
down‑ |
noun |
verb |
downscale, downsize |
The first two, en‑ and em‑, are of course different spellings of the same prefix.
I can't offhand think
of any examples for its el‑ or er‑ spellings — at least, not ones which occurred within English.
Consider also: outdate, outlaw, outside; inflame, imperil.