There is a confusion regarding the usage of the following words Assault on Assault to Assault for please give example to explain the same
closed as off-topic by Hellion, Lambie, Jason Bassford, choster, jimm101 Feb 28 at 17:59
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Hellion, choster, jimm101
First, assault is both a noun and a verb. As a verb, it can be both transitive and intransitive, according to Webster's New World Dictionary, Fourth Edition.
He committed assault.
I was assaulted by her.
He committed assault on Wednesday. (Ha! That is bit of linguistic fun using the words "assault on"; one doesn't really commit assault "on" someone; they just assault him or her. But see the example below.)
Basically, the pronouns cited in the question do not really work with "assault" except in special circumstances. Here are some examples:
He committed assault on a teacher. This is the way a legal citation might be worded.
He committed assault by threatening the teacher with a gun.
"Assault to" and "Assault for" are unusual phrasing in the normal sense of the action of assault. However, I can construct a sentence that uses assault for in this sense:
He was charged with assault for the threat he made against the teacher.