In legal parlance, the word "assault" historically means an attempted battery (battery being defined as below) or an intentional frightening of another person. No contact is necessary. On the other hand, battery is when the unwanted contact actually takes place.

Does everyday usage of these words tacitly acknowledge this difference?

4 Answers 4


In everyday usage, I'd say that assault is commonly used, and means 'to attack', which is slightly different to the legal meaning which is the threat of an attack (battery), combined with the a demonstration of the means to attack.

Battery is less commonly used outside the law, however, in the UK at least, the verb to batter is still commonly used:

In the playground:

Cough up or I'll batter you.

= Please give me your dinner money, or I'll be inclined to commit battery

In the pub:

Q: How did the game go?

A: I absolutely battered him!

= I won by quite a margin!

  • And what were those people doing in the pub? Getting battered, of course :)
    – psmears
    Mar 27, 2011 at 21:26

In the U.S. at least, the word battery is so rarely used outside the legal phrase assault and battery that a listener would be pretty much guaranteed to assume it meant an electrical battery unless it was specifically disambiguated by context. So I think perhaps the question is misguided, as I can't say with any certainty that there is in fact an "everyday usage" of both words. Assault on its own, however, does tend to be used as shorthand for sexual assault, whereas "battery" is wholly separate from that connotation.

  • What about "to be assaulted" and "to be battered"?
    – Eldroß
    Dec 9, 2010 at 10:07
  • 4
    I disagree that assault tends to be shorthand for sexual assault. I think it isn't limited to the legal definition in common parlance, but I don't think most people would think "rape, indecent exposure or sex crime" when they hear someone was assaulted.
    – bikeboy389
    Dec 9, 2010 at 22:54
  • @Eldros: Good point, but we are talking about the nouns. As Colin Fine says on Rhodri's answer, "battery" isn't as connected in people's minds with "to batter" as perhaps it should be. @bikeboy389: It's just the usage I've noticed. Whether it reflects a larger trend I can't say.
    – Jon Purdy
    Dec 10, 2010 at 0:04
  • Police reports -- which the news media often quote from -- seem to use assault in the sense of physical attack, and clearly say sexually assaulted where appropriate. (It's very interesting that the police would use the word differently than the prosecutors who would prosecute an assault.) There is also the military context ("the troops assaulted the bunker"), so while I agree with the comments on battery, I have to strongly disagree with the comments on assault.
    – Wayne
    May 23, 2011 at 16:22

Maybe Genesis didn't make it to the US? Being in the lyrics (and title) of "Robbery, Assault and Battery" makes battery a pretty common word. I agree that context is important. I've always thought of assault as being a single instance with battery being much more serious, i.e. a punch thrown after an argument would be an example of assault, but someone black and blue after repeated assaults would have been subject to battery.


In legal terms, you can have a battery without assault, and an assault without battery. I'm not sure I would characterize "assault" as an attempted battery; an assault can be committed without any subjective intention to harm, as in pointing a gun at another. A battery can be committed without an assault as in the case where an individual is struck from behind. The key to (legal) assault is apprehension at an imminently pending act of harm towards oneself. Take away the apprehension and the act is no longer an assault though it may ripen into a battery.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.