13

To my surprise, there's a missing question about this particularly interesting verb, dare. All I know about it is the fact it can be in two forms, as an auxiliary (without to: "I dare not mention their names") and main (with to: "Did anyone dare to admit it?") verb and the difference has something to do with agreeing with subject. Can somebody explain in a greater detail?

4
  • 'Did anyone dare admit it?' is also possible. Commented Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10
  • Oops. Had submitted an answer to this when half asleep that was completely wrong, as pointed out by @Matt. Duly deleted. And apologies for any confusion caused by my nonfunctioning brain.
    – user13141
    Commented Sep 26, 2011 at 20:05
  • Related.
    – tchrist
    Commented Apr 22, 2023 at 20:44
  • Could be seen dare like need? Only in negative or interrogative the use ofdare without to and auxiliary means it doesn`t happen,it is a subjunctive.The another wise it is a common conjugate. Commented Mar 16 at 15:35

1 Answer 1

18

Dare is a semi-modal verb. The speaker can choose whether to use the auxiliary "to" when forming negative and interrogative sentences. For example, "I don't dare (to) go" and "I dare not go" are both correct. Similarly "Dare you go?" and "Do you dare (to) go?" are both correct.

Taken from the Wiktionary.

Note that when dare means challenge, it requires to, as in:

I challenge you to ask her out.

I dare you to ask her out.

3
  • Yes, I think, that's a better example of the contrast between the semi-modal and lexical uses. Commented Sep 26, 2011 at 12:11
  • Uh… what would be wrong with 'I dare you: ask her out', please? Commented Jan 12, 2017 at 0:34
  • 1
    To Robbie's comment: that's an entirely different structure with the colon, so nothing's wrong with that either, of course.
    – Sz.
    Commented Jan 23, 2022 at 23:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .