1

This question already has an answer here:

Which one is correct? If both are correct, is there any difference in the meaning?

He didn't dare to contradict his parents.

He didn't dare contradict his parents.

marked as duplicate by tchrist Jun 15 '17 at 0:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • You might be interested in ELL, our sister site, which is a good site for basic English questions. – anongoodnurse Nov 19 '14 at 3:01
  • There's a third valid choice: "He dared not contradict his parents." – Peter Shor Nov 19 '14 at 3:02
  • 1
    This has been dished here before. – John Lawler Nov 19 '14 at 3:23
  • 1
    @Peter And a fourth: “He durstn’t [or durst not] contradict his parents”, if you're all right with sounding a bit Victorian and stuffy. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Nov 19 '14 at 4:09
  • @JanusBahsJacquet That, or backwater-British rustic, maybe somebody whose family hasn’t wandered down out of the highlands for a century or more. – tchrist Nov 19 '14 at 4:28
1

Need and dare are sometimes referred to as semi-modal verbs. See this answer to a previous question for a good roundup of the rules.

0

Both are correct. In my experience, there is no significant difference in meaning.

I will say that I personally feel like "He didn't dare contradict his parents" sounds more educated, but that's entirely a subjective assessment, and others may feel differently. But neither sounds wrong.

Note: When dare is used in the imperative (command) form, it is almost always used with to. So "Dare to try!" will be much more readily understood than "Dare try!" (and some may argue the latter is even incorrect).

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.