What are the differences between "unto" and "to"? It seems that in many contexts where the word "unto" is used, "to" could be substituted and would be perfectly correct. It reminds me of flammable/inflammable, where "flammable" came into use because the "in" in "inflammable" caused people to think that it meant not inflammable. Is this a similar situation?
The origin of unto, as reported from the Oxford English Dictionary is the following:
ORIGIN: from until preposition with to preposition replacing northern equivalent till preposition.
Therefore, the relation between to and unto is not the same relation there is, e.g., between touchable and untouchable.
One of the meaning of unto reported from the same dictionary is until, till. The dictionary reports also that unto indicates "regular recurrence within specified units of time, as day unto day."
Doctor Manley…praises Kate unto this day.—I. Maclaren
In the King James "unto" seems a bit like placing something like a gift or idea or anything with some kind of substance unto the person, place or thing/idea of acceptance. exp..."the river flows over the banks and unto the road" or "I wrote a letter unto you" Now the word "to" is more of an expression in grammer in which the person, place or thing/idea is directly or indirectly expressed. exp..."I went into my room to write a letter unto you" I went to write unto you.
"Unto" is just an older form of "To".
I've never seen anything to suggest that there was a confusion regarding "unto/to" akin to "inflammable/flammable".
protected by tchrist♦ Sep 29 '14 at 3:12
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?