2

Is there a single word that refers to someone who doesn't eat food derived from mammals? This person would eat fish and other seafood, poultry, eggs, but would not eat the meat of mammals, nor anything made from the milk of mammals.

9
  • 6
    There's a list of terms here, none of which quite match but you could combine prefixes and suffixes and get something. (Made up words are frowned upon in ELU answers.) But if you want to explain your exact dietary requirements, you are better to explicitly say "I eat X Y Z, I do not eat A B C" rather than use an obscure term that people won't understand.
    – Stuart F
    Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 11:55
  • 2
    Yeah...I gottaa agre with @StuartF for the most part. Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 18:01
  • english.stackexchange.com/questions/345315/…
    – Mari-Lou A
    Commented Mar 27, 2022 at 7:53
  • Not quite - abstainer from red meat and milk products.
    – samfrances
    Commented Mar 27, 2022 at 10:43
  • 1
    Mafist is the closest term but your question is a bit more specific which includes not eating products made from the milk of animals also. Single word for someone who does not eat mammal's meat
    – ermanen
    Commented Mar 28, 2022 at 13:59

2 Answers 2

2

As far as I can see, there is not an established English term to describe this. However, I think I found a neologism...

Pollotarian

A pollotarian is someone who eats poultry but not red meat or pork products.

-HealthLine.com

People choose this dietary pattern for various reasons. For some, becoming pollotarian is a step towards becoming vegetarian, while others are more concerned about the health and environmental effects of eating red meat.

It is not an exact match, but your criteria are extremely specific, and may not have a a useful term...

5
  • 2
    Could be saurophage, too. Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 18:37
  • 2
    ...like lizard eating? Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 19:17
  • 2
    Yep, as desert dessert. Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 21:06
  • 2
    Holy Guacamoles, that sounds so yech...although I have dined on alligator tail in Fort Lauderdale...with a mustard sauce quite tasty...as they always say...tastes like chicken with a fishy accent, but really chewy. txs for the memories... Commented Mar 26, 2022 at 21:09
  • It's defined in Wikipedia, which certainly licenses it as a neologism rather than a protologism in my estimation. Perhaps a very recent addition. Commented May 22 at 11:31
-1

I've been calling myself an amammiovore (from "not mammal eating" in Greek and Latin) for over 30 years now since I have been an amammiovore for almost 46 years. I still think amammiovore is the best term I have seen. That is what I call myself as someone who has very specifically refrained from eating mammals ("red meat" is not the right term) since 1978. I coined the word myself as I simply wanted a name for my very specific condition since there was none that I could find over 30 years ago.

I have a degree in biology, which is non-negligeable credentials for supporting my answer.

However, I simply cannot call myself a mafist (or mafism as used to describe the condition), which apparently is currently the term in vogue, as I recently have discovered. Mafist doesn't ring true to my inner being. The term has no clear etymological foundation to it that I can discern and has unpleasant associations of words that are close to it in spelling (e.g., mafia), or words that are irrelevant. Maia is Greek for mother, but not eating mammals has nothing to do with mothers per se, other than mammalian mothers make breast milk. Other non-mammalian species have females and thus “mothers” too. The "fist" sounds closed, with Germanic and Indo-European roots, when being an amammiovore is more spiritually open sounding and is in the same etymological and biological naming tradition of "carnivore" (meat eating) or "herbivore" (plant eating). Fist could also be fest, but there is nothing festive about not eating mammals either. I have been in military feasts where the whole table had to wait until my seafood dish came out since the cook had forgotten to comply with my specific request and by protocol they could not start on their prime rib until I had been served. Like I said, I don't make exceptions. If you prefer mafist, that's fine, and use that term. However, I like the word "amammiovore" better because it is etymologically based on Latin and Greek and has a more open spiritual feel to it. To each his or her own.

5
  • 1
    Could you edit this answer so that it is more concise and to the point? See Help Center
    – fev
    Commented May 15 at 17:53
  • 5
    Hello, Frederick. Words newly accepted into the lexicon are neologisms. Inventions with little currency are protologisms, non-words, which are off-topic on ELU. Your 'amammiovore' does not appear in any dictionary as far as I can see, and has a negligible number oh appearances on the internet ... people won't recognise it, and few will understand it. Commented May 15 at 18:01
  • Actually this is not a new term. I introduced the word amammiovore around 2005 on Yahoo Answers. It was on the internet for 10 to 15 years with people actually using it, then disappeared about 5 years or so ago. Maybe the demise of Yahoo Answers had something to do with that. Prior to my introducing the word amammiovore there was no word for not eating mammals. This word mafist has only appeared in the last few years. Amammiovore is much more intuitive than mafist. An educated person can readily detect its meaning. I speak from having followed this for over four decades. Commented May 16 at 11:16
  • 1
    And when you inform guests or staff in a restaurant that you are an amammiovore, are you never asked for its meaning? I don't think at first sight its meaning is even clear. That you coined a term that fits your needs doesn't mean everyone in the anglo-speaking sphere has been notified. It's a -1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Commented May 22 at 10:37
  • When I am at a restaurant, I usually don't even use the word amammiovore. I don't force it on anyone. I simply order something vegetarian or with poultry or seafood. The word just evolved in my consciousness so that I'd have something to call myself. I did share it on this forum in case someone else doesn't eat mammals and was looking for a suitable word. The meaning was clear to me : the prefix "a" means "not" as in "atypical" (not typical) - or amoral (not moral). "mammio" is directly from "mammal". "vore" is "eating'' as in carnivore (meat eating) or herbivore (plant eating). Commented May 30 at 10:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .