3

I see this paragraph in "The life of Samuel Johnson"

"Pope, who then filled the poetical throne without a rival, it may reasonably be presumed, must have been particularly struck by the sudden appearance of such a poet; and, to his credit, let it be remembered, that his feelings and conduct on the occasion were candid and liberal. He requested Mr. Richardson, son of the painter, to endeavour to find out who this new authour was. Mr. Richardson, after some inquiry, having informed him that he had discovered only that his name was Johnson, and that he was some obscure man, Pope said; 'he will soon be deterre.' We shall presently see, from a note written by Pope, that he was himself afterwards more successful in his inquiries than his friend."

What mean of "deterre"? I think it is french word

And What mean of "We shall presently see, from a note written by Pope, that he was himself afterwards more successful in his inquiries than his friend".

I think it means Pope understand Johnson better than Richardson. Right or wrong?

2
  • 2
    It's probably just a typo for deterred
    – user339660
    Commented May 17, 2019 at 7:26
  • 1
    More likely an English representation of déterré. Commented May 17, 2019 at 17:56

1 Answer 1

5

From the context, the translation of the French verb déterrer (to unearth) fits pretty well. As in 'he (and his identity) will soon be déterré (unearthed or uncovered). Presumably, the inference is that very talented people are rarely unknown or obscure, as their talents are already known in certain circles, even if not widely publicised.

'We shall presently see' is a narrative device to inform the reader that all will be revealed - if you are patient enough to read on!

3
  • 1
    I think it means that Pope was, later, able to find out more about Johnson than Richardson had done. Commented May 17, 2019 at 8:24
  • @mattxxx4, I am not certain that sentence mean Pope understand Johnson better than Richardson OR Pope is more excellent than Johnson in writing Commented May 17, 2019 at 9:36
  • See @KateBunting above.
    – mattxxx4
    Commented May 17, 2019 at 9:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .