4

In formal (not colloquial) English, is an organisation such as a sports club singular, plural, or is it discretionary? E.g. is it preferable to write "The X club WAS formed" or "The X club WERE formed", or doesn't it matter?

0

1 Answer 1

4

Both "club" and "organization" are examples of collective nouns. In standard American English we would always use singular verb agreement with both "club" and "organization."

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/599/01/

However, in British English the rules are somewhat different, and it is not uncommon to see plural verb agreement with collective nouns like this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_noun

Although it is not uncommon, it is not universal. In fact as stated in the Wikipedia article referenced, often the distinction is in the context of the usage.

In British English, it is generally accepted that collective nouns can take either singular or plural verb forms depending on the context and the metonymic shift that it implies. For example, "the team is in the dressing room" (formal agreement) refers to the team as an ensemble, whilst "the team are fighting among themselves" (notional agreement) refers to the team as individuals.

In the context of the example you provided, i.e. formation of a club, formal agreement appears to be the most commonly used. A search of the BNC shows only one example of "club were formed" whereas "club was formed" occurs nine times.

Thank you to @snailboat for helping to improve my answer.

2
  • Thanks, that's answered my question - I favoured the singular in spite of being of British extraction Commented Oct 26, 2013 at 1:50
  • I'd say 'the club/team were formed' is just plain wrong. Mind you, I don't like the 'England was beaten' the Aussies like to announce either. Since it's acceptable over there, I can't say it's wrong, but it sounds wrong to my ears. Commented Oct 26, 2013 at 15:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .