Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with syntactic-analysis
Search options not deleted
user 66208
Parsing or syntactic analysis is the process of analysing a string of symbols, conforming to the rules of a formal grammar.
0
votes
"From the above analysis, we can see that" VS "From the analysis above, we can see that"
Both forms are correct and mean the same thing.
The adjective "above" can be used as a post-positive adjective. In some cases post-positive adjectives can vary the meaning of the sentence, but not in …
- 1,666
0
votes
Didn't you USED TO or Didn't you USE TO?
It should be use to.
Why? Because you're using a did(not) in your sentence. The general rule is that when you use 'did' in a sentence, the tense used is present.
For example (though in both cases, the …
- 1,666
1
vote
is it correct to say "though" in this context
Start the sentence over. No need to keep the though in at all. I think it would sound better with a little rearrangement too.
I know I have been asking a lot of questions and I am sorry for wastin …
- 1,666