Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with prepositional-objects
Search options not deleted
user 28405
0
votes
4
answers
3k
views
Can I substitute 'to' for 'for' here in order to not repeat 'for' twice [closed]
I'm trying to rewrite this sentence, can someone suggest a grammatically correct (and better) sentence:
I was not prepared for his calm enthusiasm for my question.
I'm thinking something like:
…
- 239