Is it possible to use the abbreviation "w.r.t." in academic papers?
-
4No, it is not advisable.– JLGCommented Jun 27, 2012 at 17:06
-
3Your title says technical papers and your question body says academic papers. Which is it?– chaosCommented Jun 27, 2012 at 17:07
-
1Academic, so technical.– user278064Commented Jun 27, 2012 at 17:14
-
2@user278064: They aren't synonyms or even overlapping, really. Academic writing and technical writing are vastly different styles.– chaosCommented Jun 27, 2012 at 17:18
-
5"Possible"? Yes. In fact, in a mathematics paper one would write "w.r.t." meaning "with respect to" and no one would think twice about it.– GEdgarCommented Jun 27, 2012 at 20:15
4 Answers
It's possible, but it's a bad idea. It's not part of the conventions of academic writing, so will typically be read as clashing in style with it.
-
3Academic writing conventions vary between fields. Justaskin_ is correct to say that it would be fine in a maths paper.– RupeCommented Nov 10, 2015 at 13:59
In mathematics "w.r.t." is part of the standard jargon. It is not unusual to see it used (sparingly) in peer-reviewed journal articles.
-
Here is an example, where you can find w.r.t. journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1624 Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 7:56
See,
With Regard To (or) with reference to
I think is supposed to be written in papers or letters in order to direct attention towards or to refer to something that was being discussed immediately before these words... OK?
Now, I think in technical or academic papers using "w.r.t" abbreviation for "With Regard To" may not be incorrect, but it may be misleading or ambiguous. As "w.r.t" may stand for something else as well. For Example it may stand for "Windowed Radon Transform" and if something like this is a part of the discussion, then use of such abbreviation is uncalled for.
-
4When I see w.r.t. I interpret it as with respect to. Per ngrams for with respect to,with regard to,with reference to,With respect to,With regard to,With reference to, phrase with respect to occurs more often than either phrase you mentioned. Commented Jun 27, 2012 at 18:05
-
1Wouldn't "Windowed Radon Transform" be WRT instead of w.r.t.?– jinaweeCommented Sep 17, 2018 at 13:11
David Foster Wallace uses this abbreviation all the time. It's awesome. Depends on the tone you are going for; DFW uses it to evidence his desire for efficient language is on balance with his sprawling analysis of 'ineffable' artistic topics.
I agree with it's use in a mathematician's paper, as efficiency is prized in that study. History, humanities, etc - it's a no go.
Oh yeah, I'm a mere BA holder, so account for that in your advice acceptance criteria.
-
2You might want to back this up with some sources and further explanation. In its current form, this is not a strong answer. Thank you!– user11550Commented Jun 10, 2014 at 4:31