Does "for all the" mean a contrast or a cause and effect?

"For all the work he put in, the project was sure a disaster. "

Does this mean because of all the work he put in, the project was bad? May you infer if he the project was good, then he didn't work hard?

  • 2
    Both. It's adversative, meaning 'in spite of' -- there was (a lot of) work put in to bring about a result, but the project was not a success even with all that work. Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 0:16

1 Answer 1


MW defines "for all" as "in spite of." So the primary effect is to draw a contrast; one might expect that his work would have led to success, but in fact he nevertheless failed.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.