1

I was checking out the definition of a phrase and found a definition which says it doesn't contain a subject/verb and gave the following example:

Persuaded by the prosecutor's evidence, the jury convicted the defendant of robbery

In which the phrase is the following:

Persuaded by the prosecutor's evidence

But isn't persuaded a verb?

Improve this question
3
  • 1
    Sure, persuaded is a verb. But that phrase does not contain a subject and a verb.
    – Lambie
    Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 17:08
  • 1
    Persuaded is one form (the past perfect participle) of a verb. Participles are often used as adjectives, though not here. So it doesn't lack a verb; it does lack some auxiliary verbs, though. Here persuaded is the relic of having been persuaded; the by phrase indicates that the participle is part of a passive construction, somewhat chewed up by Conversational Deletion.
    – John Lawler
    Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 18:03
  • The subordinate adjunct clause has no overt subject, but we understand it as "the jury". So it is a clause with an understood subject and a verb, "persuaded". The verb "persuaded" is untensed, so we have a non-finite clause functioning as an adjunct, more specifically a passive one. Btw, the comma marks the clause as a supplement, a non-integrated adjunct as opposed to a modifying one.
    – BillJ
    Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 18:18

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

I was checking out the definition of a phrase and found a definition which says it doesn't contain a subject/verb

That definition is incorrect. Cambridge defines "phrase" as:

a group of words that is part of, rather than the whole of, a sentence

There are various more precise, technical definitions of the term, but no definition would exclude the participial phrase "persuaded by the prosecutor's evidence" in the sentence you mentioned.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .