Consider the sentence:

I did not only go to the store.

It has the same meaning as

Going to the store was not the only thing I did.

Is the first sentence grammatically correct, or do I need to add an independent clause to it?

  • The first sentence is nonsense.
    – Hot Licks
    Aug 30 '19 at 1:06
  • I do not only disagree with the previous comment, but I also think the first sentence makes complete sense. It's less common to omit a second clause, but that doesn't mean it's wrong to do so. If I did not go to the store is fine (which it is), then I did not only go to the store is also fine. Aug 30 '19 at 1:12

I did not only go to the store.

The sentence is grammatically correct, but it does beg a second clause or sentence(s).

As in: Google Books

Going Down Under Over

I did not only go Down Under.

The second sentence cited from Google Books:

It is a great story to show how God took my family to Australia.

In context I would suspect the next sentence(s) would explain what else one did on the trip to the store.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.