1

After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, went to Beijing to study philosophy, participating in a lot of classes given by professors, but never having been registered as a formal student. [self-made]

Will it be ambiguous to use "participating", since it is not clear in this sentence that the phrase following participate modifies "to study philosophy". So maybe it is necessary to divide it into two sentences?

5
  • 2
    The PP (here, PPs in a parallel-ish structure) is seen as modifying the main clause (here with subject deletion) immediately preceding. It needs an 'and', and the abundance of commas complicates. Use brackets to make it easier on the eye: After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, and went to Beijing to study philosophy (participating in a lot of classes given by professors, but never having been registered as a formal student). Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 8:30
  • It does not modify 'to study philosophy,' it stands on its own as another item in the list. One could say "... to study philosophy by/ through participating in a lot of classes given by professors, ...." Rest of the sentence seems to be okay.
    – Kris
    Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 9:04
  • 1
    @Kris It does modify went ...philosophy!!! Because it's a present participle clause (without having) it portrays the action as concurrent with or an extension of the clause it's modifying. It can't be part of a co-ordination of main clauses because it's a subordinate clause. The sentence is missing an and after friends, which would greatly improve it. If you move the participle clause it can only go directly before or after the clause it it modifying. It therefore shouldn't be able to go before and after the other clauses (I-job; said-friends) - and lo and behold, it can't. * Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 11:22
  • The example is not a good one; there is more semantic cohesion between the third main clause 'went to Beijing to study ...' and the following participial clauses (/ phrases; PPs above) than between the first two main clauses and the 'PP's. I'd say a second sentence (or parentheses) is far better here. Probably, the term 'modify' to mean 'sort of apply / attach / correspond / link to' is better avoided. Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 13:47
  • @Araucaria Think again. Or perhaps, you had meant the sentence as it stands.
    – Kris
    Commented Sep 8, 2014 at 4:37

1 Answer 1

1

I don't see a problem with introducing "participating..." as a (lengthy) offshoot of the parallel element "went to Beijing to study philosophy," but I do see a problem with the clause beginning "but never having been registered..."

After the opening introductory phrase "After one year," the sentence splits off into three parallel phrases that branch from the pronoun "I":

quit my job

said goodbye to my friends

went to Beijing to study philosophy

So far, so good. But the remainder of the sentence presents some difficulties. If the entire wording "participating in a lot of classes given by professors, but never having been registered as a formal student" is supposed to build out from the "went to Beijing to study philosophy" branch of the immediately preceding parallel structure, then first of all you need to add "and" before that last branch to make clear to readers that there are three parallel branches and not more:

After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, and went to Beijing to study philosophy, participating in a lot of classes given by professors, but never having been registered as a formal student.

At this point, "participating" becomes an alternative way of saying "where I participated," which is fine—except that it calls for bringing the subsequent wording "never having been registered as a formal student" into parallel with "participating in a lot of classes given by professors." The obvious way to do this is to align them as follows:

participating in a lot of classes given by professors

but never registering as a formal student

That leaves you with:

After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, and went to Beijing to study philosophy, participating in a lot of classes given by professors, but never registering as a formal student.

If you're satisfied with this wording, you're done. If it sounds a bit gamey to you, you can (with one minor alteration in the Beijing branch of the first set of parallels) turn the "participating..." part of the sentence into a "where" phrase:

After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, and went to study philosophy in Beijing, where I participated in a lot of classes given by professors, but never registered as a formal student.

It is also possible to alter the final phrase to say "but never registered as a formal student" and treat it as a fourth branch of the original set of parallels that spring from "I." Doing this turns the phrase "participating in a lot of classes given by professors" into a kind of parenthetical digression from the main points in the series of actions you are recounting and therefore requires stronger punctuation than commas to set it off in a way that readers will immediately recognize:

After one year, I quit my job, said goodbye to my friends, and went to Beijing to study philosophy—participating in a lot of classes given by professors—but never registered as a formal student.

However, I prefer the versions that appear in the two block quotes above this last one.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .