3

As a non-native English speaker, It seems to me that the word "until" is quite ambiguous. It's been told that when it's used with a date it includes the date. (Does "until [date]" mean "before that date"?)

But it's still unclear to me.

"X will be there until the 11th." When will X leave? On the 12th, right?

"X won't be there until the 11th." When will X be there? On the 11th, right?

If so, can anyone explain why it differs? Does it depend on whether it's negative and positive?

And how about other periods of time, like high school.

"X hasn't done it until high school" In this case X did it at some time during high school, right?

"X has been doing it until high school" In this case it seems to be unclear when X stopped. During high school or before starting high school.

Then with an attempt of clarification:

"X has been doing it until he entered high school" Does it mean X stopped doing it before or just after he entered high school? Or could it be both?

Is this clear to native speakers or is it just me?

Edit: Seems like a lot of my confusion was made by this answer. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130205142054AAIqP06

5
  • It might be just you ;) I am a non-native speaker and it is clear to me. X never drove until high-school (he got a car in the vacation so he could go the longer distance). X took the bus until high school (he stopped taking the bus because of the longer distance) X will be there until the 11th. I expect him to leave on the 11th - without clarification I cannot tell if he will leave at 6am or 6pm but he will leave on the 11th. If he wont be there until the 11th, he will arrive sometime after 0:00am on the 11th
    – mplungjan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 8:35
  • 1
  • mplungjan, that is a good explanation.
    – Tristan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 11:21
  • mplungjan, about "X never drove until high-school", does it mean that X started driving not before the first day of high school? Meaning he started at any time during high school?
    – Jan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 12:39
  • 3
    As soon as you add a negative to a sentence, you are adding a very different semantics and syntax. Especially when talking about quantification of time. Verbing doesn't weird grammar; negation does. Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 14:12

7 Answers 7

1

"X will be there until the 11th." When will X leave? On the 12th, right?

X would leave on the 11th.

"X won't be there until the 11th." When will X be there? On the 11th, right?

Yes, they would arrive on the 11th.

"X hasn't done it until high school" In this case X did it at some time during high school, right?

Yes, it means that X did something for the first time when they were in high school.

"X has been doing it until high school" In this case it seems to be unclear when X stopped. During high school or before starting high school.

To me, it clearly means that X stopped doing something when they started high school.

Then with an attempt of clarification:

"X has been doing it until he entered high school" Does it mean X stopped doing it before or just after he entered high school? Or could it be both?

It means that X stopped doing something when he entered high school. Writing it this way is a possibility but, not really necessary. It was expressed sufficiently with the previous quote.

Is this clear to native speakers or is it just me?

That is clear and sentences that use the word until, like that, are used regularly by native speakers.

5
  • On the first question, I would also intuitively say 11th but due to several explanations like this wiki.answers.com/Q/…, it lead to the erroneous statement of 12th. Also the statement "out of office until 11th" generally means you will come to office on 12th, but I do agree that it's a difference between leaving and coming. About "doing it until he entered high school", I think it's still unclear whether X stopped after he set his foot in high school or just before. "stopped when X entered" doesn't state the order of which came first.
    – Jan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 12:22
  • 1
    Jan, contradicting explanations could be down to other people who don't understand these kind of sentences or who express them with different wordings, in their particular regions. Regarding "out of office until 11th", tells me that someone will return to their office on the 11th.
    – Tristan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 14:09
  • 1
    Jan, regarding your last comment about "doing it until he entered high school". It does not necessarily matter about exactly when. In many situations it is enough just to tell someone approximately when something happened. Unless you have a particular reason or personal desire to say exactly when X stopped, such as recording it in a diary, the wording that you used would be enough.
    – Tristan
    Commented Jun 20, 2013 at 14:27
  • Tristan, you are probably right about "out of office", but it seems like more than me are confused about that. answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130205142054AAIqP06 Also asked several of my friends who all have different opinion about the returning date.
    – Jan
    Commented Jun 21, 2013 at 1:00
  • Jan, that shows that there are more people who don't understand how sentences that use the word until, like that, are regularly used.
    – Tristan
    Commented Jun 21, 2013 at 23:22
5

Until generally means up to this point. It is unabmiguous when the point referred to is an exact demarcation.

I am here until 2PM (at 1:59:59 I am still here; at 2:00:01 I am gone)

When referring to a condition or state of affairs that has a duration, it suggests the change will occur at or near the start of the duration

I am staying away until he is gone (I will return immediately upon his departure, or soon thereafter)

It is especially ambiguous when used with a time specific reference that has a significant duration

I will be there until Thursday (leaving at minute after midnight Thursday morning? at noon? by 11:59 PM?)

This last example might even mean

I am there through Wednesday, but will be elsewhere on Thursday

Context often helps. When used with a negative, and refering to a period with a duration, it often means the start of that duration.

I will not be back until Thursday (I will be back on Thursday, probably all day, although exactly when is not clear)

1
  • The claim that until 'suggests the change will occur at or near the start of the duration' seems to be confusingly at odds with the rest of the answer, which correctly brings out that until is ambiguous when used with a term for a period of time (while being unambiguous when used with a term for a moment in time).
    – jsw29
    Commented Nov 7, 2021 at 16:51
4

I think it's fair to say that until always indicates the end of a period of time, but:

It will happen until ... is specifying the end of a 'positive' period of time, i.e. the event will continue until the specified date (or period), and presumably then finish.
Hence a positive until is indicating the end of the event in referred to.
E.g. The season continues until the end of September means The season finishes on or about 30th September.
Analogous to Edwin's example: I swam regularly until I went to university means I stopped swimming regularly when I went to university: it didn't happen while I was at university.

It will not happen until ... is specifying the end of a 'negative' period of time, i.e. the event will continue to 'not happen' until the specified date (or period), and presumably then start happening.
So a negative until is in fact indicating the start of the event referred to, i.e. the start of the positive period.
E.g. The season doesn't start until the beginning of June means The season starts on or about 1st June.
To borrow Edwin's example: I had never played squash until I went to university means I started playing squash while at university: it did happen while I was at university.

Whether the period in question is inclusive or exclusive of the mentioned date is often ambiguous, but may be apparent from the context. I offer the following as 'general guidance' (but certainly not to be relied upon when the actual date is critical to you):

A positive until normally includes the specified date (or period).
E.g. The show is on until 28th June would usually mean that 28th June is the last night on which you can see the show.
Thus, the 'positive' period includes the date.

A negative until normally excludes the specified date (or period).
E.g. The show is not on until 28th June would usually mean that 28th June is the first night on which you can see the show.
Thus, the 'negative' period excludes the date, and hence the immediately following 'positive' period necessarily includes the date.

In both cases, the event you are actually interested in, namely "the show" is inclusive of both dates.

As Edwin has indicated, where the time of day is more critical, as in He is / isn't here until ..., there is an ambiguity as to the precise time, but normally both dates would be inclusive of the period that he is here.

He is not here until the 11th = He arrives on the 11th.
He is here until the 15th = He departs on the 15th.
Thus, his period here includes (at least part of) both days.

4

You are right in that there is (sometimes) ambiguity in the meaning.

Some expressions have one possible interpretation:

"I (had) never played squash until / before I went to university" is clear enough - I played squash only after going up (if at all, but this would be a quirky take).

They do not have to be negative statements:

"We played squash until 1 pm" is non-negative but still unambiguous.

It's when the time reference itself is imprecise that possible ambiguity arises.

"John will be there until the 11th." What time on the 11th? The exact moment the day starts? (unlikely). We use this sort of expression rather loosely to indicate that you may or may not find him there if you go looking for him at some time on the 11th. He may leave at the start of the day, in which case you'd miss him; he may leave at noon, in which case you might catch him. You're only really sure to catch him on the 10th (9th, 8th...) (and assuming he's not at the cinema etc, of course).

With negative statements, it's clearer:

"John won't be there until the 11th." You won't catch him on the 10th, 9th... But you've a chance on the 11th. More so later in the day.

'Up to and including' and 'until and including' are widely used to show that the end-point of the interval in question is meant to be included, but with a 'wide end-point' (like 'the 11th'), a certain amount of uncertainty is bound to remain.

2
  • I am not sure it is clearer with negative statements. "Until the 11th, John will not be there" seems to me that it might want to suggest John will be there neither on the 11th nor before.
    – Henry
    Commented Oct 23 at 15:49
  • I'm afraid I disagree. "Until the 11th, John will not be there." The default reading is that John is expected 'there' on the 11th. (Following context may negate this: "Until the 11th, John will not be there. Definitely. I'm not too sure about the next three days, either." Other context may also licence the 'incomplete' reading.) // This fits with Gricean maxim compliance, the consensual use of implicature (Don't say 'I can see three cats' if you can see five.' It's logically true, but contravenes communication mores.) Commented Oct 23 at 17:25
1

Human languages are not always exact (as opposed to math or computer languages) and are many times ambiguous. Consider the possibility that this may be one of these cases. The point of the answer is that you can't expect something a language can't (always) inherently give.

0

It means two things: "up to the time of" and "before." It's usage is somewhat ambiguous. So it's better to clearly mention what you mean.

I am here until Friday. That means that I am here on Thursday, but not Friday. To make it clear, you can say: I am leaving on Friday.

Nobody had a clue about HIV until 1981. It means nobody knew anything about HIV before 1981. It was 1981 that researchers found out about it.

You have until the 15 of May to submit your assignment. I'll assume it includes May 14 and 15. But that's more like my hunch. So, in short, it's ambiguous.

To avoid this ambiguity, I think it's better that you clearly mention what you want to convey to your readers. For example:

All paper work must be completed through the online system no later than March 15.

You have up until and including the 25 of May to complete your assignment.

1
  • 1
    'I am here until Friday. That means that I am here on Thursday, but not Friday.' Not so. You can both be here on Friday (morning say) and leave on Friday. Commented Aug 7, 2017 at 10:07
-3

How to correctly interpret "until" seems straightforward to me. In junior school telling the time posed some difficulty at first, for example, some kids could not understand why it was 25 minutes to the hour and not 35 minutes past the hour. If a restaurant has a sign, which reads we don't open until 10, then you don't arrive at 9 expecting the restaurant to be open. The reason is and in context until means "as far as" and no further or said differently with a deadline you have all the time up to the the date mentioned but not on that date.

I don't think that I'm missing the point but feel that how others use "until" do so incorrectly. To be clear there is no ambiguity with "until". Any ambiguity that arises is because the writer uses the word incorrectly and is lazy. Collins (dictionary) states "If something happens until a particular time, it happens during the period before that time and stops at that time." That is very specific (unambiguous). It is the sloppy writer who fails to add clarity by assuming that "until" covers a "specific time" for instance I'm here until Friday means what it says and is defined as, rather if the person is actually leaving on Friday then in context this is improper use of the word (until) and not because 'until' is ambiguous or for lack of clarity of definition of the word but improper use of same by the writer. In this instance the onus is on the lazy writer to qualify an actual time of departure on Friday not on "until".

1
  • 2
    You're missing the point here. 'I will be in Crewe until Friday' is idiomatic, but 'Friday' can't be considered a punctive time reference in this example. Assuming the speaker's statement proves true, people may or may not be able to reach them in Crewe at 11:00 am on Friday (but will not be able to reach them in Crewe on Saturday, ...). Commented Aug 7, 2017 at 10:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .