40

I used to think PM/AM was correct, but at some point, I switched to using p.m./a.m. for reasons I can't recall. I know that in practical, casual writing, people tend to use whatever form is most convenient to them, but I'm curious about what the official usage—should it exist—actually is.

What is the correct or official form for these initialisms?

  1. Are they capitalized?
    • 4 pm
    • 4pm
  2. Is there a space before them?
    • 4 PM
    • 4PM
  3. If the correct usage is a.m./p.m., how does this affect punctuation at the end of a sentence?
    • Should we meet at 4 p.m.?
    • Let's meet at 4 p.m..

(Let me know if these should be split up into individual questions, but I figured that because they were all related to these initialisms in particular, it might be okay to ask them all in one question.)

Improve this question
3
  • possible duplicate of Do I spell out a time in an essay?
    – MrHen
    Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 20:27
  • The formatting questions have been covered before. The question of order is a bit different and could probably use its own question (and I am not sure you actually asked that question.)
    – MrHen
    Commented Apr 26, 2011 at 20:29
  • Ah sorry. I did search before posting, but I didn't notice that question.
    – user4012
    Commented Apr 27, 2011 at 5:18

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
26

Because the initials in question are of Latin origin ("post meridian"/"ante meridian"), it makes sense to keep consistent with other Latin abbreviations, e.g. (oh there's one right there) "i.e.", "e.g." when there are two words.

I would say, use whatever seems natural, but I prefer "10 p.m." and "8:30 a.m.", for example.

Improve this answer
2
  • I like this as a reasonable explanation. I hadn't thought of the Latin origin, but that does make more sense now. Thanks.
    – user4012
    Commented Apr 27, 2011 at 5:19
  • 1
    This isn't a great argument IMO - Latin abbreviations are inconsistent in their capitalization: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_abbreviations. Worth noting that this article lists both "a.m." and "P.M.".
    – 0x5453
    Commented Nov 10, 2020 at 14:16
16

An alternative from The Guardian Style Guide:

times

1am, 6.30pm, etc; 10 o'clock last night but 10pm yesterday; half past two, a quarter to three, 10 to 11, etc; for 24-hour clock, 00.47, 23.59; noon, midnight, not 12 noon, 12 midnight;

Improve this answer
2
  • 2
    I agree with The Guardian. 6.30pm is the simplest and least intrusive form, so it should be used.
    – FumbleFingers
    Commented Jul 10, 2011 at 21:02
  • 2
    Note that this style guide also uses . instead of : to separate hours and minutes. E.g. 6.30 vs 6:30.
    – Dennis
    Commented Apr 23, 2014 at 14:58
12

Instead of AM and PM (in small caps), p.m. and a.m. -- with lowercase and periods -- are the preferred way to indicate time of day.

According to the The Chicago Manual Style used by journalists.

Improve this answer
1
6

If you leave out the dots, you should also omit the space, otherwise am looks like an independent word. Personally, I prefer to include both the dots and the space.

In the USA, I've seen them reduced further, with times like 8:00a and 6:00p. Worse, this was on a timetable (aeroplanes), where I'd expect to see the 24-hour clock used. It confused me for a while. I can't imagine how confusing it must have been for travellers from countries where the 24-hour clock is used everywhere.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    It was 4:46pm when I wrote the comment. It was 4:46 pm when I wrote the comment. It was 4:46 PM when I wrote the comment. It was 4:46 p.m. when I wrote the comment. Of those 4 sentences, I find "It was 4:46 pm when I wrote the comment" to be the most pleasing. When I read a time, I assume that the meridiem period is going to follow. In that context I don't need 2 periods to remind me that a.m. or p.m. is an abbreviation. In fact I find it distracting to see the periods.
    – Kirby
    Commented Feb 27, 2020 at 0:47

You must log in to answer this question.