Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/923071052820963328
Post Reopened by Mitch, user66974, NVZ, Xanne, JEL
added 107 characters in body
Source Link
herisson
  • 84.5k
  • 9
  • 216
  • 368

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'? (I was thinking about these examples... 'look' is intentioned while 'see' is not necessarily intentioned.)

(information from some later comments made by the original poster):

  • In fact, I think I have it all backwards. I was focused less on definition and more on application - but after another click, 'Attend' seems to suggest more intention than 'concomitant' (Merriam-Webster: "attend").

  • There is even a suggestion that no intention attends the usage (Merriam-Webster: "concomitant").

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'?

(information from some later comments made by the original poster):

  • In fact, I think I have it all backwards. I was focused less on definition and more on application - but after another click, 'Attend' seems to suggest more intention than 'concomitant' (Merriam-Webster: "attend").

  • There is even a suggestion that no intention attends the usage (Merriam-Webster: "concomitant").

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'? (I was thinking about these examples... 'look' is intentioned while 'see' is not necessarily intentioned.)

(information from some later comments made by the original poster):

  • In fact, I think I have it all backwards. I was focused less on definition and more on application - but after another click, 'Attend' seems to suggest more intention than 'concomitant' (Merriam-Webster: "attend").

  • There is even a suggestion that no intention attends the usage (Merriam-Webster: "concomitant").

added 716 characters in body
Source Link
herisson
  • 84.5k
  • 9
  • 216
  • 368

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'?

(information from some later comments made by the original poster):

  • In fact, I think I have it all backwards. I was focused less on definition and more on application - but after another click, 'Attend' seems to suggest more intention than 'concomitant' (Merriam-Webster: "attend").

  • There is even a suggestion that no intention attends the usage (Merriam-Webster: "concomitant").

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'?

Is the word 'concomitant' utilized only when intention attends the usage? The word 'attendant' means the same in many cases but doesn't seem to carry the sense of intentional concurrency. Should these two words be treated as we treat 'look' and 'see', 'listen' and 'hear'?

(information from some later comments made by the original poster):

  • In fact, I think I have it all backwards. I was focused less on definition and more on application - but after another click, 'Attend' seems to suggest more intention than 'concomitant' (Merriam-Webster: "attend").

  • There is even a suggestion that no intention attends the usage (Merriam-Webster: "concomitant").

Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Arm the good guys in America, Edwin Ashworth, MetaEd
edited tags
Link
Phil Sweet
  • 17k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 67
Source Link
Loading