0

I wish I have been there for the baby kicking for the first time?

Could I change the sentence to

I wish I was there for the baby kicking for the first time?

What are the differences between the two sentences?

1

2 Answers 2

5

Both sentences given are slightly incorrect, I’m afraid. I think the form you want is probably

I wish I had been there for…

(In speech or informal writing, this would often be contracted: “I wish I’d been there for…”) Also good, as Robusto said, is

I wish I could have been there for…

although this only works if your absence was unintentional — if you knew when to expect it and just chose not to go, this version doesn’t apply.

The versions

I wish I were there for…

I wish I was there for…

are appropriate for an event happening right now, not for something that happened in the past. You might have a phone conversation: “The baby is kicking right now!” “Oh! I wish I were there for it!”

The form

*I wish I have been there for…

isn’t correct for anything (although it’s a fairly common error among non-native speakers, and people wouldn’t have difficulty understanding it).

3
  • Hey, poor were asks why he wasn't given preference over his stepbrother... Commented Jan 18, 2011 at 3:32
  • 1
    I agonised over this; but a maxim I try to follow (with limited success) is “say one thing at a time”. A discussion of the subtleties of were vs. was here would get in the way of the more basic point; so I put were first and gave it an extra example, but left explicit mention of the issue for another day. Like yesterday, for instance :-P
    – PLL
    Commented Jan 18, 2011 at 3:44
  • PLL, you are the best. Now I know how to use each correctly.
    – mko
    Commented Jan 19, 2011 at 3:47
3

If you weren't there, you should say

I wish I could have been there the first time the baby kicked.

or

I wish I had been there the first time the baby kicked.

You're asking about the tenses, but notice that I changed the latter half of the sentence as well. To say "for the baby kicking for the first time" sounds kind of awkward.

3
  • +1 — I think it’s the echoed for that makes the original version a bit clunky. It’s not wrong, but as you say, it’s certainly awkward.
    – PLL
    Commented Jan 18, 2011 at 3:15
  • 1
    @PLL: Yes, and I just thought of something else about it that bothers me. When you say "for the baby kicking" sounds like the kind of kicking you hear in "ass-kicking" ... so a "baby-kicking" sounds like something I wouldn't want to attend.
    – Robusto
    Commented Jan 18, 2011 at 4:10
  • Wow, it does sound ass-kicking! There are so many additional aspects that I could think of.
    – mko
    Commented Jan 19, 2011 at 3:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.