1

Merriam-Webster defines "could do worse" as an idiom:

used to say that a particular choice, action, etc., is not a bad one
You could do worse than to vote for her.

Although I would have gone with simply "vote" without "to" myself, I think it's still okay to add "to" after "could do worse than", as shown in M-W.

That said, I was wondering if using "voting" would be also correct here.

There's a 2011 thread showing this form:

...you could do worse than using a simple JScript application.

Where nobody seems to raise any question about the form "using."

And then here's a 2022 New York Times article adopting the form "adding":

There’s a character in Adam White’s debut novel, “The Midcoast,” who at one point starts to chafe against her small-town circumstances and decides to do something about it. “She went to the library,” White writes, “and started checking out every kind of book — romance novels, spy novels, biographies, memoirs, history books, cookbooks — anything in print.” That’s my kind of character, I thought when I reached that passage, and if it’s your kind of character too then you could do worse than adding “The Midcoast” (think “Ozark” meets “The Great Gatsby” in Maine) to your reading list this week.

Does this mean this -ing form is always natural after "could do worse than"?

4
  • 'You could do worse than marrying the King of England.' grunge.com/216607/… Commented May 24, 2023 at 0:52
  • 1
    I think requesting a specific answer from a reputable source regarding the use of an idiomatic construction is inherently unreasonable; yes, "you could do worse than using a simple JScript application" parses grammatically to the meaning intended - which is what a formal source could tell you. It's an unusual use of the idiom, but idioms are by definition unusual uses of language. I don't know that you can have your cake and eat it too. Commented May 25, 2023 at 16:26
  • @RyanJensen What makes you say it's an unusual use of the idiom? I don't think idioms are necessarily outside the realm of grammatical explanation. The idiom 'you can have your cake and eat it too' certainly follows all the relevant grammar rules.
    – JK2
    Commented May 25, 2023 at 23:41
  • I think it's an unusual use of the idiom because I'm a native speaker and have heard or read the idiom used that way (with an -ing) perhaps three times in my life, while I have heard the 'to ______' form hundreds or thousands of times. As I mentioned in my first comment, yes, the -ing form is grammatically valid. That doesn't make it standard, though. There being no formal body who determines idiom usage, I assumed standard or normal is what you meant when you asked if it would be 'correct.' Commented May 26, 2023 at 15:02

2 Answers 2

3

Dictionaries include sentences involving different strings after 'than':

  • [+ infinitive]: He could do worse than marry Eleanor. [Longman]
  • [+ infinitive]: You could do worse than take a leaf out of the health economists' book. [Longman]
  • [+ to-infinitive]: The West could do worse than to base its policy towards the Middle East on that aspiration. [Longman]

  • [+ to-infinitive]: You could do worse than to vote for her. [Merriam-Webster]

  • [+ noun phrase]: If you’re looking for a good career, you could do worse than a job in banking.

[Farlex Partner Idioms Dictionary]

I've found no authority licensing the use of an ing-clause after 'could do worse than', but there are reasonable numbers of examples on the internet:

  • And later, you could do worse than trying some traditional Dutch food for dinner. [Reverso]

  • Politicians could do worse than going to see Sartre's play. [Jonathan Webber, New Statesman]

  • ... role in today's complex world, you could do worse than seeing what Stanley McChrystal has to say about the subject . . . [Michael Herrera; MHA Consulting]

  • In the wake of all the scandals and controversies, the Catholic Church could do worse than having a scientist as pope. [The Guardian; 2013]

But this is partly subjective; I'd use In the wake of all the scandals and controversies, the Catholic Church could do worse than to have a scientist as pope.

I'd say that there is a style rather than a grammatical constraint on the optimal choices here.

  • If you’re looking for a good career, you could do worse than a job in banking is punchier than an alternative phrasing using say 'getting / ...'.

  • He could do worse than marry Eleanor sounds less stuffy than He could do worse than to marry Eleanor.

  • The West could do worse than to base its policy towards the Middle East on that aspiration is easier to parse than The West could do worse than base its policy towards the Middle East on that aspiration and the formal tone is not out of place.

  • Politicians could do worse than going to see Sartre's play sounds more natural than Politicians could do worse than go to see Sartre's play or Politicians could do worse than to go to see Sartre's play (the 'go to see' structure informs here).

9
  • What do you think licenses the VPs following could do worse than? In the OP, the VPs are to vote for her, using a simple JScript application, and adding “The Midcoast” to your reading list this week. I doubt that the VPs are comparative clauses even though they follow "than". If we can figure out the thing that licenses the VPs, we might be able to figure out whether the -ing form is also grammatical.
    – JK2
    Commented May 19, 2023 at 2:56
  • In a similar construction, do you think it's still better to use -ing than (to)-infinitive? Politicians could do more than going to see Sartre's play
    – JK2
    Commented May 19, 2023 at 3:18
  • C1: The stuff of theses. And then someone writes a conflicting one. C2: I think I'm with you in thinking that 'could do more than go' or 'could do more than just go' sounds better than 'could do more than going'. What a language. Commented May 19, 2023 at 14:33
  • C1: I think it should be either than or the matrix clause that licenses the complement of than. Does it have to be that difficult to figure out?
    – JK2
    Commented May 20, 2023 at 2:55
  • It's usage, not traditional rules, that license. Hence 'extragrammatical idioms' (and the others; why not 'boat of the desert' / 'kick the pail' / 'Hold your mules! / 'Tom's your uncle / ...?) My opinion is that " 'Politicians could do worse than going to see Sartre's play' sounds more natural than 'Politicians could do worse than go to see Sartre's play' or 'Politicians could do worse than to go to see Sartre's play' ... but others could well disagree. At some levels, idiomaticity is as important as grammaticality. Commented May 20, 2023 at 10:49
0

The essence here is that whatever follows "you could do worse than" (in the given context) has to function as a noun phrase/substantive of some sort that will provide a comparator.

The full infinitive; the bare infinitive, and a gerund all fulfil that criterion as do other substantive phrases.

You could do worse than a horse.

You could do worse than buy a horse.

You could do worse than to buy a horse.

You could do worse than buying a horse.

You could do worse than the buying of a horse.

You could do worse than that.

You could do worse than John.

You could do worse than John's.

You could do worse than his.

You could do worse than him.

You could do worse than the one that John brought on Saturday when he was drunk.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .