In Logic & Mathematics textbooks, the terms 'L-formula', or 'L-term', or 'L-theory' are used. (Though for math, it is reserved to mathematical logic.)
I've witnessed it first-hand, and I'm sure many did also, where authors will alternate between using the articles 'a' & 'an' quite a lot. I assume it's due to the pronunciation: it's odd to say 'a Ell formula' ('an' would be more appropriate in that case) versus 'a L-formula' (do not say 'L'); it raises the question, which is more appropriate?
Examples
Let L be a signature (language), and let the formula X, be an L-formula.
It is the case that a L-theory Y is incomplete if one of its formulae cannot be proven true or false.
All the terms v, w, y belong to the universe of L, and thus an L-term is born.
Note that... The context may be a factor at play, the author may want to remind us that the formula is still an L-formula, but wanting to focus more on proving a point (say, the requirements for something to be a formula), then they might say a L-formula.