Today's Formula 1 Grand Prix ended in a bit of a controversy and there was a protest that the regulations had not been applied correctly by the officials. The relevant article (48.12) includes:
"If the clerk of the course considers it safe to do so, and the message 'lapped cars may now overtake' has been sent to all competitors via the official messaging system, any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car."
The problem was that only a subset of lapped cars were directed to overtake the leaders, which had a material effect on the outcome of the race (it was just the lapped cars between the leader and the racer in second place that went on to win as a result as it allowed him to close up to the leader before the restart).
A protest was rejected, and one of the grounds was that "any" does not imply "all", but that seems incorrect if it is speaking of a requirement, rather than merely permitting lapped cars to overtake the leaders (which would defeat the object of the regulation, which is to prevent them interfering with the racers on the lead lap).
So in this case, is it reasonable for "any" not to mean "all"?