Timeline for Does "any" necessarily mean "all" when speaking of a requirement?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2021 at 9:06 | comment | added | Dikran Marsupial | " when it is not important which" in this case, it was the "which" that was crucial. If they had let them all through (which is what has happened on every occasion before this one) there wouldn't have been enough time to restart the race (and that would have been a consideration in the leader's choice not to change tyres as that would have lost them the race). It is a badly worded regulation. | |
| Dec 13, 2021 at 9:02 | comment | added | Dikran Marsupial | I think the "will be required", rather than "may be required" is important. The requirement is not conditional, so the "will be required" makes no sense unless it is applied to all. It is the context that is the issue for me. | |
| Dec 13, 2021 at 8:34 | history | answered | Anton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |