0

Should I repeat an auxiliary verb like "was" after "and" for a passive tense?

Here's an example:

It was shipped to laboratory in maximum time of one hour and was frozen at –80°C.

  • You can if you want to. It makes it clearer, but clarity is not everything. Note that the sentence has several article mistakes; laboratory needs an article, and so does maximum time – John Lawler Apr 11 '18 at 18:11
  • Yes, it should. – Qian Chen Apr 11 '18 at 23:41
-2

The was shipped could easily be changed to shipped, they are both acceptable. The and was frozen at -80°C however should always have the was as without it, and froze at -80°C sounds more like a scientific observation of the freezing point than a statement of action.

It is perfectly fine to repeat "and" and "was", especially when they are this separated. If it was something more list-like, such as it was made, packed and shipped then in that situation, repeating "and was" sounds awkward. This is for the same reason repeating "and" in a list sounds awkward, though it is not necessarily wrong

Most of this is my opinion, this topic is kind of subjective. I am sure you could find something to this effect in a style guide, but I should be programing right now so I'm not going to go looking for one. ;)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.