I'm looking for a single word, noun or adjective, that conveys the meaning "having the power to both create and destroy" something specific. For example:

The magician seemingly had < insert word here > over rabbits, able to pull them from thin air, and equally return them to nothingness


The network administrator can both create and delete user accounts, they have < insert word here > over/on/with user accounts.

Some words that I've considered but don't quite fit are

  • sovereignty (too specific to politics)
  • potency (not quite right)
  • omnipotence (implies non specific power)

To clear some things up in response to comments.

  • the creation/destruction need not be physical.
  • there's no wizardry involved. Regarding the magician, think stage performer not wizard
  • the word should not be limited to power over a specific thing, e.g. sovereignty grants per to create and repeal laws, but not the power to create and destroy rabbits
  • the word should be modifiable in combination with a subject to indicate a single thing or concept to which the power applies
  • the word should not be too general, such as omnipotence meaning power over everything
  • This is quite far from the mark, but refiability (from reify) may be a slight nudge in the right direction. The ability to construct is explicit; to destroy, implicit.
    – Lawrence
    May 1, 2016 at 11:05
  • For the wizzard, consider "omnipotence" or "overwhelming or full power". For the network administrator, you may use "full authority".
    – Graffito
    May 1, 2016 at 11:24
  • full power, total control, would fit.
    – arrivalin
    May 1, 2016 at 11:54
  • In the real, physical world, it is impossible to create or destroy matter. The laws in question are some of the most fundamental humanity currently knows of: the conversation of mass (or, equivalently and more commonly used, the conservation of energy). So the wizard's magic must be precisely in breaking or subverting these laws. So you could riff on the idea of your sorcerers being "conservity-breaking" or "non-conservative", etc. Or, you could invoke Noether's theorem relating conservation laws to symmetries, and say your magi are "time variant" (vs "time invariance").
    – Dan Bron
    May 1, 2016 at 12:49
  • I brought you into this world, I can take you out of it. May 1, 2016 at 13:21

5 Answers 5


As invited:

Consider reifiability (from reify) as a nudge in the right direction:

Reify verb Make (something abstract) more concrete or real - ODO

The ability to construct is explicit in the term, and the ability to destroy is implicit.


There is a legal sense of absolute ownership in dominion that might fit.

"Perfect control in right of ownership. The word implies both title and possession and appears to require a complete retention of control over disposition. Title to an article of property, which arises from the power of disposition and the right of claiming it..."

There is also an idiomatic use: gain dominion over someone or something: to achieve total authority over someone or something.

  • Nice, but also implies more control than I intend
    – sirlark
    May 1, 2016 at 15:51

I guess you can use omnipotent


  • 1
    Thanks, I considered that, and have updated the question accordingly. I'm looking for something without the connotation of power over everything. Also, the ability to create and/or destroy does not imply the ability to control, which omnipotence does
    – sirlark
    May 1, 2016 at 13:31
  • 1
    Please explain why you feel this answers the question.
    – tchrist
    May 1, 2016 at 14:55

Reimancy- The overarching magic school of conjuration- the ability to bring something into existance from seemingly nothing, and abjuration- the ability to make something become nothing. This looks like its creating or destroying a thing, but its merely moving it somewhere else in the multiverse.

  • -1: this answer is completely incorrect. Reimancy doesn't exist in English, it's an invented word used by a fantasy roleplaying site. Abjuration is the renunciation of something by oath: your definition is an invention. Nov 23, 2018 at 2:00

The magician seemingly had meddle over rabbits, able to pull them from thin air, and equally return them to nothingness.


The network administrator can both create and delete user accounts, they have meddled over/on/with user accounts.

I think the word 'meddle' is what you're looking for simply because it implies an unfinished state of being, somewhere between 'creation' and 'destruction'.

  • 1
    I've never seen "meddled" as anything but the past tense or past participle of meddle. Is it possible you're thinking of another word?
    – user888379
    Nov 23, 2018 at 1:37
  • meddle means "interfere in something that is not one's concern", which is not the meaning the OP is looking for. Also, it's a verb - it's incorrect to say "had meddle over" (using it as a noun). Nov 23, 2018 at 1:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.