2

I am trying to refer to a number of ancestors in two ways, and I need two terms or even two adjectives for "ancestors" that will distinguish one from another.

The case I am interested in is where there is pedigree collapse, where one person is an ancestor of the proband in multiple ways.

For example, the following simple pedigree of Cleopatra (from Wikipedia)

enter image description here

The diagram identifies 13 ancestors.

In genealogy, the typical method of denoting ancestors is through a pedigree chart, where each generation of the chart shows both parents for each person of the previous generation and thus always grows in a binary manner, with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... ancestors listed at each generation. Of course, not all the ancestors are always known and some of the ancestors may repeat.

So the above Cleopatra tree will then be shown as:

        - Ptolemy V Epiphanes
      - Ptolemy VIII Physcon
        - Cleopatra I Syra
    - Ptolemy IX Latyros
        - Ptolemy VI Philometor
      - Cleopatra III
        - Cleopatra II
  - Ptolemy XII Auletes
        - Ptolemy V Epiphanes
      - Ptolemy VIII Physcon
        - Cleopatra I Syra
    - Cleoptra IV
        - Ptolemy VI Philometor
      - Cleopatra III
        - Cleopatra II
- Cleopatra VII Philopator
        - Ptolemy V Epiphanes
      - Ptolemy VIII Physcon
        - Cleopatra I Syra
    - Ptolemy X Alexander I
        - Ptolemy VI Philometor
      - Cleopatra III
        - Cleopatra II
  - Cleopatra V
          - Ptolemy V Epiphanes
        - Ptolemy VIII Physcon
          - Cleopatra I Syra
      - Ptolemy IX Latyros
          - Ptolemy VI Philometor
        - Cleopatra III
          - Cleopatra II
    - Berenice III
          - Ptolemy V Epiphanes
        - Ptolemy VIII Physcon
          - Cleopatra I Syra
      - Cleopatra Selene I
          - Ptolemy VI Philometor
        - Cleopatra III
          - Cleopatra II

This shows 38 ancestors, but there are only 13 individuals, many of whom are repeated multiple times due to the inbreeding.

My question is I want to refer to the two different counts of ancestors. So what would be the best terminology to use to say:

I have 13 __________

I have 38 __________

12
  • 1
    How about "13 unique ancestors"?
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 29, 2015 at 22:47
  • 1
    That works for me.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Dec 29, 2015 at 22:57
  • 3
    I’d say that 38 of the branches in my family tree are filled by just 13 unique individuals.
    – Jim
    Commented Dec 29, 2015 at 22:58
  • 1
    I wouldn’t say 38 total ancestors for a number of reasons. One is that to me that implies 38 unique individuals. Another is that you have many more than 38 ancestors - it just depends on how far you choose to go back.
    – Jim
    Commented Dec 29, 2015 at 23:02
  • 2
    Going beyond 'there are 13 ancestors' is stretching the accepted meaning of 'ancestor' unacceptably (unless there's a technical usage I'm unaware of); it will lead to confusion. I'd stick with 'There are 13 ancestors shown in this simplified genealogical chart, but they make multiple appearances (totalling 38). Commented Dec 29, 2015 at 23:10

1 Answer 1

1

For your use, I would employ 'predecessor',

a. A person who comes before another person in time; an ancestor, a forefather, a forebear.

For the sense of 'individual ancestors',

I have 13 predecessors.

Or, similarly, I might use 'progenitor',

  1. A person from whom another is descended; an ancestor, a forefather; a parent.

For that same sense:

I have 13 progenitors.

For the more general sense of 'ancestors', understanding your use of 'ancestor' to mean 'a position in the genealogical structure', I might use 'ascendant',

  1. One who precedes in genealogical succession; an ancestor; a relative in the ascending line, whether lineal, as father, mother, or collateral, as uncle, great-uncle.

So in your second example:

I have 38 ascendants.

While the context may make the distinctions between the terms you use evident, it might also be advisable to make explicit the distinction between 'predecessors' or 'progenitors' in the sense of 'individual ancestors' and 'ascendants' in the sense of 'a position in the genealogical tree'.


Note also that, depending on the purpose or nature of the genealogy, I might use 'propositus' rather than 'proband'. This is because the sense of 'proband' is usually restricted technically, as

Med. and Genetics. The individual with whom the investigation of a family for a genetic disorder or other inherited trait begins; the first member of a family to be diagnosed with a hereditary disease or trait.

'Propositus', on the other hand, is not restricted in technical use to a primary ancestor considered with reference to genetic disorders or inherited traits, but is more generally applied to any individual viewed as the basis of a genealogy:

  1. A person from whom a line of descent is derived; an individual from whom family relationships are calculated or on whom a genealogy or pedigree is based.

(All definitions from OED Online. Phrase emphasis in definitions of 'ascendant' and 'proband' is mine.)

3
  • I don't see why "predecessor" or "progenitor" or "ascendant" is any better than "ancestor". The problem is not the word "ancestor" but how to distinguish the two counts of ancestors. Some suggestions in the comments indicate an adjective (e.g. total or unique) might do, but I'm looking for something that will most clearly distinguish the two types of counts and indicate the meaning.
    – lkessler
    Commented Dec 30, 2015 at 21:39
  • The question uses the word "proband", maybe incorrectly, but isn't asking about its meaning. See: english.stackexchange.com/questions/184681/…
    – lkessler
    Commented Dec 30, 2015 at 21:46
  • 1
    @lkessler, you asked, I answered. As the definitions make plain, both 'progenitor' and 'predecessor' refer to ancestors without reference to genealogy or genealogical succession, while 'ascendant' does refer to position in hierarchical succession, rather than simple ancestry. Hence the accuracy of using the 'ascendant' for the 38 positions. // I don't know the thrust of your genealogy; 'propositus' is simply an offering of what may be a more precise term than 'proband' for your use, in case you weren't aware of it.
    – JEL
    Commented Dec 30, 2015 at 23:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .