0

I am trying to decide between

"may just have yet to upload" or "may just have not yet uploaded"

Is one preferable to another technically (not just opinion).

6
  • could you provide some context?
    – andi
    Commented Feb 19, 2015 at 20:02
  • It's for a paper I'm writing. I guess I was asking if there was any grammatical reason for preferring one over the other Commented Feb 19, 2015 at 20:04
  • I meant could you provide the surrounding sentences, to give that some context? That way we can better understand if there's a better way to write it.
    – andi
    Commented Feb 19, 2015 at 20:09
  • 1
    The have yet to VP idiom has very restricted syntax. If you're not familiar with it, don't use it. Commented Feb 19, 2015 at 20:16
  • have I misused it? Commented Feb 19, 2015 at 20:36

1 Answer 1

3

Neither is preferable, to be honest.

Simply, simplify, simplify. I suggest either

"It may have yet to upload."

Or,

"It may not have uploaded yet."

Sentence one sounds a bit hoity-toity. Sentence two sounds less snooty and would likely be more common in everyday parlance. The choice is yours.

3
  • I can see that you might want to use upload intransitively sometimes, but surely anything that can be uploaded can't carry out the action of uploading -- a person or automated system uploads data. So I would go for the passive, but still drop the "just" - "it may have yet to be uploaded" or better "it may not have been uploaded yet"
    – Chris H
    Commented Feb 20, 2015 at 8:42
  • @ChrisH: Good point. You may want to forgive me, as I'm computer-lingo challenged; but hey, I'm learning! Commented Feb 20, 2015 at 16:28
  • No problem at all, it's just my opinion. You've got the right point and it's more than possible I'm being old-fashioned anyway.
    – Chris H
    Commented Feb 20, 2015 at 19:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .