Exceed is commonly used, but when I found myself wanting to use the opposite I couldn't really find a single word that would do it.
fall short of and inadequate are a little off.
How about deceed?
Exceed is commonly used, but when I found myself wanting to use the opposite I couldn't really find a single word that would do it.
fall short of and inadequate are a little off.
How about deceed?
There are a handful of options depending on context:
They have exceeded expectations
They have missed expectations
They have eluded expectations
You have exceeded the limit
You are under the limit
You are beneath the limit
Profits exceed costs
Costs exceed profits
Profits are below costs
Profits did not meet costs
cost:profit
example and hadn't thought of inverting the relationship of what was being exceeded, i.e. "Expectations exceeded his capabilities."
Latin roots: exceed or excessus (surpass, go above, go beyond, go over, top, beat).
Latin roots: recede or recedere (move away, retreat, withdraw, drawback, draw away).
Maybe this is one of the cases where the context helps a bit to choose the correct expression. In evaluations it often says "below expectation / meets expectation / exceeds expectation (choose one)".
In a sentence, I'd be inclined to use:
Tom has exceeded our expectations, but Jim has fallen behind.
Underwhelm is one of my favorites as it is so thoroughly an antonym of overwhelm, which could take the place of exceeded expectations.
If you need to use expectations I would have to default to longer expressions like did not satisfy, fell short. Exceed, coming from excess, has no direct-sounding antonym that carries its connotation that feels natural to me.
If you wanted to be glib and Jim was know to be underwhelming, you could say that Jim met your expectations. To be followed up with, and that is why we have decided to terminate his service with our company.