4

My dad asked me if the following sentence was grammatically correct:

Chris confirmed to have modified the PLC tag.

To me, the "to have" part seemed incorrect. I thought the sentence would have to be written something along the lines of this:

Chris confirmed that he had modified the PLC tag.

In response to this, my dad argued that similar to how you could say "Chris promised that he would do something", and "Chris promised to do something", you should also be able to say "Chris confirmed that he had done something", and "Chris confirmed to have done something".

Is this correct, and if not, why?

Improve this question

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
0

You are right. The confirmed to have phrasing is awkward, and if I heard or read it I would have difficulty understanding the meaning.

The comparison with promise to is interesting. I tried various other verbs in these sentences, like said, agreed, denied, doubted. In all of the cases I thought of, the ... to have done ... phrasing sounds wrong, while ... that he had ... sounds right. But actually that's true of promise as well, if you use the same tense: promised that he had done something works, but promised to have done something does not.

So one response to your father's argument is that the to have done construction just isn't correct, even for promise.

But that isn't the whole story, because even if we switch to the tense where promised to works, most other verbs still don't sound right in that phrasing. Agreed is the only one I came up with that works this way: Chris agreed to modify the PLC tag is just fine, but Chris denied to modify the PLC tag is not.

There may be some linguistic explanation for this, but I'm not aware of it. I'd just say that for certain verbs the to do something has developed as an acceptable idiom, but for most it is not right.

(But in another context ... Chris confirmed to have modified the PLC tag would be perfectly understandable as a newspaper headline. In this case I would interpret it as Someone has confirmed that Chris modified the PLC tag, so it has a different meaning than in your example. This relies on syntactical idioms used in headline writing.)

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Past-participial "confirmed to have X" is perfectly standard and the Corpus of Contemporary American English has many examples including from the New York Times "So far, at least three people are confirmed to have died", ABC News (US) "Mack is the only one confirmed to have stayed with NXIVM long term", Business Insider "At least six people were confirmed to have died in their cars while attempting to flee." army.mil "To date, 120 active-duty Soldiers are confirmed to have taken their lives" (The OP's example is in note form and omits "is").
    – Stuart F
    Commented Jan 25 at 13:32
  • @StuartF Those are all passive uses, not active as in the OP's example. If the sentence was "Chris was confirmed to have modified the PLC tag", I would agree that it's standard usage. But that would mean somebody else confirmed it.
    – Dave Costa
    Commented Jan 26 at 1:16
1

When confirmed is used adjectivally it is complemented by the infinitival clause:

The patients in the study were confirmed to have taken the medication at the correct dosage.

When used verbally, confirmed is complemented by the declarative clause:

Trained hospital staff confirmed that all patients in the study had taken the correct dosage of the medication.

Compare:

They say that it took 300 years to build.

It is said to have taken 300 years to build.

Improve this answer
0

The sentence is trying to say "They confirmed" without he/she/them. That is the challenge in light of expectations now placed on gender. In the business world, it is safer to avoid those pronouns.

Struggling with this verbiage without using pronouns: For self-employed borrowers, the signer confirms to have verified that the business is open, active, and operational at the time of this verification.

So, your father's suggestions are good.

Also: Chris confirmed [to have] modifying the PLC tag.

Improve this answer
1

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .