0

Reading this wiki article, it seems to me that 'with the aid of' in the following sentence is a prepositional object. I suspect I may be wrong and would like a simple explanation about the grammatical functions of 'with the aid of' in the following sentence:

With the aid of a physiotherapist, everything turned out fine.

  • There's a similar thread here but it doesn't address my question about grammatical functions.
1
  • It's a prepositional phrase used as an adverb. How everything turned out. It could go at the end too.
    – Lambie
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 17:04

1 Answer 1

0

In the terminology of CGEL, with the aid of a physiotherapist is an adjunct (meaning, one can remove it and the sentence is still grammatical even when all the words in the remainder are taken in the vary same meanings they had before the removal). More precisely, it is an adjunct of means (as in, 'by what means' was something done). Other sources might call it an adverbial of manner. However it is called, it is realized by a preposition phrase (PP). The head of this PP is the preposition with, and the complement of this preposition is the noun phrase (NP) the aid of a physiotherapist. The whole PP is fronted, though it could also be placed at the end, as in Everything turned out fine with the aid of a physiotherapist.

Note that with the aid of is actually not a syntactical constituent of the sentence. The constituent structure is, rather, this: [With [the [aid [of [a physiotherapist] ] ]. As I said above, the whole thing is a PP whose head is with and whose complement is the NP the aid of a physiotherapist. That NP, in turn, is composed of the determiner the and the nominal aid of a physiotherapist. The head of the nominal is the noun aid. The nominal also has a post-head complement, which is the PP of a physiotherapist (it is a complement rather than a modifier because the head noun licences the particular preposition; aid here cannot be followed by just any PP, but only by PPs headed by a very restricted set of prepositions, such as of. For example, on would not work at all, regardless of what followed it). Finally, this final PP has a complement, the NP a physiotherapist, which consisits of a determiner, the indefinite article, and the nominal, which is the noun physiotherapist.

12
  • It's adverbial, I'd say. But I guess that doesn't fit whatever grammar you use.
    – Lambie
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 17:05
  • @Lambie Indeed, many sources would call it that: an adverbial of manner. I added that to the answer. Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 17:08
  • Thank you. You know when I read some of the explanations in terms of actual OP questions, they seem over the top. Much of the time, I doubt they will be understood by most participants here. Why do you feel it necessary to drill down as much? I don't mean not drill down at all, but is re-invention of the wheel called for? Just wondering...With the aid of an angel on the head of a pin....:)
    – Lambie
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 17:10
  • @Lambie 1. Mostly because I learn that way, which is the main reason I'm answering anyway. 2. If they really don't understand, I hope they'll ask. 3. If they don't understand, they definitely don't need to accept. 4. My experience from the now-defunct Grammarly question-and-answer site is that a significant portion of askers do appreciate detailed answers. 5. There's a lot of people providing answers here, in all kinds of styles. It is good that this variety includes some who give in-depth answers that err on the side of being too detailed. Someone else can give pithy ones... Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 20:38
  • @linguistictum I was not suggesting not into details; I am suggesting that "learning languages" goes by chunks of utterances and going down to the atoms does not always help pedagogically. That's all. It would help one get one's Phd, though. I don't mean to sound mean or anything. It is just how I see things, I guess.
    – Lambie
    Commented Apr 24, 2018 at 20:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .