0

Consider the following sentence:

Harry Potter is the best book ever written. 

The word "written" is the past participle, but why?

I believe it's the passive voice, but I have a friend who disagrees.

From my understanding, Harry Potter is the direct object of the verb "write," but has now become the subject.

3
  • Welcome to ELU. "Harry Potter is the direct object of the verb write," -- in fact, book is, not Harry Potter. Now please re-read and HTH.
    – Kris
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 6:31
  • Please see also English Language Learners
    – Kris
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 6:32
  • It's a reduced relative clause: Harry Potter is the best book [that has] ever [been] written. Commented Jun 24, 2015 at 22:02

3 Answers 3

0

This is an excellent question to illustrate some rules of English grammar. Let's first analyze the sentence "Harry Potter is the best book ever written" from your friend's (correct) point of view that the sentence is not in the passive voice:

Independent clause: Subject-Verb-Predicate Nominative.

Subject = "Harry Potter"
Verb (copulative), present tense = "is"
Predicate Nominative  = "book"
Article (definite) modifying book = "the"
Adjective (superlative) modifying book = "best"

We now have to decide what to do with "written." Is it a past particle, modifying "book"? This seems unlikely. First of all, almost all books are written, and the Harry Potter series certainly was. Secondly, the claim isn't that Harry Potter is the "best written" book, but the best overall book. So that means that "written" must be a reduced relative clause, "(that) (was) ever written":

Dependent clause: (Subject)-Verb

(Subject) elided relative pronoun, antecedent "book" = ("that")
Verb, passive voice, present perfect tense = "(has been) written"
Adverb, temporal, modifying (has been) written = "ever"

sentence 1 diagram

Now let's try out your passive voice version:

Independent clause: Subject-Verb

Subject = "Harry Potter"
Verb, passive voice, present tense = "is written"
(Preposition of agency) = ("by")
(Object of preposition, the agent) = (Agent)

The Agent is left unstated, but that's OK. It happens in many passive-voiced sentences. And, in any case, we know it's J. K. Rowling. If you're right, we can substitute her name for the agent and transform the sentence into the active voice by making the Agent, the new subject and the subject, the new direct object. We get "J. K. Rowling writes Harry Potter."

Sentence 2 diagram

Now, we've got several problems. The first is the present tense. That was fine when "is" was the verb because that's the enduring present, which properly describes an ongoing situation: Harry Potter was the best book when Rowling completed it, it's the best book now, and it will likely continue to be the best book for some time. But when "is" becomes part of the passive voice of written, we have the statement that JKR is writing the book that she's already written. The sentence would be acceptable in a historical accounting that reported from the past, say, giving a timeline of JKR's life, but that' s not the context of the original sentence

We also don't know what to do with "the best book." We could make it an appositive, renaming Harry Potter: "J. K. Rowling writes Harry Potter, the best book ever." But now we're making up an entirely new sentence, not just transforming an old one into a new one. The Passive<->Action transform rule says nothing about appositives. Not only that, the word "ever" has a different role from the original, where it told us about writing. Here it tells us about the book, calling it essentially "the best-ever book." But the original was talking about eternal writing.

For these reasons, we have to reject the hypothesis that the verb in the original was in the passive voice.

2
  • 1
    That is a long lecture for saying that "the best book ever written" is short for "the best book that was ever written/has ever been written".
    – rogermue
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 12:24
  • It's a long lecture, but it's not about the fact that "ever written" is short for "that has ever been written." It's about why that's a fact.
    – deadrat
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 15:12
0

"written" in your sentence is the past participle and as the shortened relative clause is derived from a clause in passive voice, "written" has passive character.

In Latin a third base form is called perfect participle passive. In English this term was simplified to "past participle" As the third base form is not only used for passive verb forms but also for active verb forms (all perfect tenses) the term perfect participle passive does not fit so well. It is only appropriate when used for passive verb forms.

Your view that "book" is object to "write" and that it has become subject is totally queer. In "Harry Potter is the best book" "book" is a predicative compliment (in nominative; after the linking verb to be).

0

I think "the best book ever written" is an elision for "the best book that has ever been written", which is present participle perfect in passive voice.

Edit: typo

5
  • "written" is no present participle , but the third base form of write/wrote/written, which is called past participle. And English has no present participle in passive voice, such a thing does not exist. " has been written" is present perfect passive.
    – rogermue
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 3:44
  • @pazzo "the best book that was ever written" refers to a time span from past time to now expressed by "ever" and in such a case present perfect is used.
    – rogermue
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 4:03
  • No, in such a case the present perfect or the simple past can be used.
    – pazzo
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 4:12
  • @pazzo -- using past rather than present-perfect suggest that the important thing was that it was written, not that it currently exists. Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 4:39
  • I deleted the comment with the question, because it was not an inquiry. I'm a nativespeaker and know full what are the differences in meaning. I'm saying that the simple past (the best book that was ever written) is an option, not just the present perfect as here stated. Also @rogermue
    – pazzo
    Commented Jun 22, 2015 at 5:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .