Someone who intentionally says false statements and/or facts about someone else (directly related to and/or about them) with whom that person is in a conversation (with or without other people around), in order to embarress that person, bring them down or prevent/break the peace.
5
-
1The only non-expletive of which I can think is bully.– AnonymCommented Jul 19, 2014 at 23:42
-
I guess by the sounds of it, it sounds like a bully, but maybe there is other formal words/expressions that could fit here?– user76935Commented Jul 19, 2014 at 23:55
-
'Bully' means something completely different, although someone who intentionally says false things may be a bully too.– Pete855217Commented Jul 20, 2014 at 6:46
-
Do you mean that this person uses "facts and/or false statements" or "false statements and/or false facts"? (There's no such thing as a false fact. A fact is true by definition.)– wileeCommented Oct 4, 2015 at 4:26
-
I would say "bully". It can't be rumor mongering or something of that ilk if the victim is the only one present to hear the perp's line of invective.– Hot LicksCommented Jan 14, 2016 at 13:14
Add a comment
|
4 Answers
You can use rumormonger, rumor-monger, or rumor monger to describe such a person, with the assumption that rumors usually are false, or at least unverified.
a person given to spreading rumors, often maliciously.
rumor: a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts
If you want a more negative connotation, you can use slanderer.
slander: a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name. Related forms: slan·der·er, noun
-
How can it be rumor mongering if (as stated) the victim is sometimes the only one within earshot? Commented Jan 14, 2016 at 13:14
-
How would you embarrass someone if the victim is sometimes the only one within earshot?– Stuart FCommented Sep 2 at 15:27
If someone made false statements in a court of law to gets someone an unfair result, such as a wrongful conviction, that person would be a perjurer.
That might even be true outside of a court of law.
-
'Perjurer' just means someone who lies under oath. You can be a perjurer lying about yourself, nothing necessarily to do with other people. Commented Jul 20, 2014 at 6:47
-
@Pete855217: Statements aren't made in a court of law (other than by the judge or the lawyers) except under oath. So everyone that lies in a court of law is a perjurer (that all perjurers are liars). I did not assert the converse (all liars are perjurers).– Tom AuCommented Jul 20, 2014 at 14:21
-
Completely incorrect. Not everything stated in court is under oath, not every witness is asked to make all their statements under oath either..in fact they are often warned whether they are under oath or not. Getting an 'unfair' result has nothing to do with perjury either. You can perjure to get a fair result if you want, or an unfair one: the two are disconnected. "That might even be true outside a court of law"....given the word comes from the Latin words for "in advancement (per), of the law (juris etc.) it's technically impossible to perjure yourself outside court. Commented Sep 10 at 4:29
'Calumny' is close, though it's a legal term, and it refers to making statements wreck someone's reputation (which can't be done if it's done in private.) 'Slander' is probably better. 'Libel' is no good, as it happens in a publication.
Consider, badmouth [someone]
To criticize or disparage, often spitefully or unfairly: those cross-Atlantic aficionados who persistently idolize the British theater and bad-mouth Broadway (Benedict Nightingale). American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition
