8

I am aware of the idiom like a fish out of water. What intrigued me is an article using like a fish takes to water.

Teo Zhen Ren, the swimming sensation from Singapore, took to swimming like a fish takes to water.

Is like a fish takes to water a valid usage? Is it an idiom? I thought the usual phrase was like a duck takes to water.

9
  • 10
    It's a valid usage, but it's out of tune; it sounds like it was composed by a non-native English speaker. Fish don't take to water, any more than humans take to air. Take to X is an idiom that means 'adapt to a new X environment'. Fish live in water by definition; nothing new. Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 18:28
  • 1
    Please don't quote articles without saying what you're quoting.
    – TRiG
    Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 18:41
  • 1
    I think the phrase you read is a compounded malapropism of Like fish out of water and Like duck takes to water. If you have the opportunity, you should write to the editorial contact of the article to point out their misconception. Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 19:05
  • 2
    I think ELU needs this question like a duck needs a bicycle. Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 19:22
  • 1
    Said the fish to the duck: “Ah you think water is your ally? You merely adopted the wet. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't see the air until I was already a smolt, by then it was nothing to me but suffocating!”
    – Patrick M
    Commented Oct 2, 2014 at 0:43

5 Answers 5

11

Like a duck takes to water is a well known idiom, and has references in appropriate reference materials (e.g. books on idioms). Here, that and more duck idioms are discussed. As you've stated, it means easily.

However, googling like a fish takes to water gets many hits, where it's used exactly like like a duck takes to water. However, they are blog sites; there are no idiom explanations.

I suspect people use it because mixing of metaphors occurred somewhere along the line.

Fish idioms include: like a fish out of water, swims like a fish, drinks like a fish, and others.

3
  • 16
    People take to mixed metaphors like a fish takes to mixed metaphors.
    – BrianH
    Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 18:47
  • 1
    @BrianDHall You mean, with little to no comprehension?
    – Zibbobz
    Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 20:41
  • 1
    Yes, ignorantly. Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 23:29
4

The correct idiom is "Take to something like a duck to water": (from TFD)

to learn how to do something very quickly and to enjoy doing it
    Sue just took to motherhood like a duck to water.
    He's taken to his new school like a duck to water.

Like a fish takes to water appears to be a variant of the original saying.

0
4

Like a fish takes to water

is valid, but not right. The "took to water" part suggests they weren't always in the water. Better (I believe) is:

He took to [his new job / skiing / living in Spain / other activity] like a duck to water.

However, your particular example is essentially the only place your phrase is used - when that activity is swimming.

3
  • "your example is the only place it is used" - when what is used?
    – Marthaª
    Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 19:31
  • 1
    I disagree that it is "not quite right." The writer is presumably inverting the trope, which is fair game.
    – Robusto
    Commented Oct 1, 2014 at 19:41
  • 3
    It isn't "not quite right". It is "quite wrong". A duck is born on land, but instinctively know how to swim: it "takes" to water. A fish is in water its whole life -- except perhaps the very end. Commented Oct 2, 2014 at 0:09
3

It seems to me more likely that the intended fish/water reference above is to the expression "like a fish in water," as in this quotation from a letter by Daniel Baker, from Port Lavaca, Texas, on June 26, 1848, reprinted in The Life and Labours of the Rev. Daniel Baker D.D.: Pastor and Evangelist (1858):

O, it is pleasant to preach to a people who seem to be so eager to hear the word of life. It rouses me delightfully, and I feel as if I was in my own native element ; or, as the saying is, like a fish in water. I do believe I was cut out for a missionary — no mistake.

2

I am a non-native speaker and I frequently hear such idiomatic constructions. Probably, the writer assumed that since both duck and fish take to water equally, they could be interchanged.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .