Skip to main content
added 109 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
tchrist
  • 137.3k
  • 49
  • 376
  • 609

Position Placing the object of an infinitive before it instead of after it

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “ wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the same United States to disturb and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States”“wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the same United States to disturb and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturbto disturb in the passage cited above? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what'swhat’s this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trialpage 54 of America on Trial, by Alan Dershowitz

Position of infinitive

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “ wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the same United States to disturb and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what's this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trial, Alan Dershowitz

Placing the object of an infinitive before it instead of after it

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the same United States to disturb and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb in the passage cited above? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what’s this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: page 54 of America on Trial, by Alan Dershowitz

Replaced quotated material from Aaron Burr's indictment to remove the ellipsis.
Source Link

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “wickedly“ wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the…Unitedthe same United States to disturb, and to stir stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States.”States”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what's this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trial, Alan Dershowitz

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the…United States to disturb, and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States.”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what's this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trial, Alan Dershowitz

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “ wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the same United States to disturb and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what's this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trial, Alan Dershowitz

Source Link
user50720
user50720

Position of infinitive

At the beginning of 1807, based on information gathered from Burr’s correspondence allegedly showing that he had begun preparations for a large-scale military expedition, the former vice president was arrested in Louisiana and indicted on the charge of “wickedly devising and intending ♦ the peace and tranquility of the…United States to disturb, and to stir, move, and excite insurrection, rebellion and war against the said United States.”

Would someone please affirm the position of to disturb? Am I right in thinking that it can equally be planted at ♦, as one might in contemporary English?

If correct, what's this stylistic placement called? Also, what are its advantages or disadvantages? I find it more onerous and less lucid; I had to reread it to determine the infinitive.

Source: P54, America on Trial, Alan Dershowitz