I know there's a multitude of similar questions, but I just can't find one that clearly applies to my problem. The sentence I'm struggling with deals with an obligation and sounds similar to this.
The party shall refuse to implement the measure if the measure would result in an infringement.
Am I mistaken in thinking "would" can (and should) be used after "if" in a sentence like this? We're talking about a hypothetical situation in the future that must be avoided.
The original sentence, written by a non-Anglophone translator, which I'm looking at now, says "if the measure resulted in an infringement", but this doesn't seem right to me. I'm not even sure if this—strictly speaking—qualifies as a conditional sentence.
P.S. This is a question that concerns English grammar, not law. Another example sentence would be "Don't eat any more cookies if it would make you feel sick".