2

If I wanted to turn this sentence written in the active voice:

  • People believe he may be fired

to one with Personal passive structure, how should it end?

He is believed to ... 1) be likely fired; 2) may be fired;

or 3) Should the whole sentence should be "He is expected to be fired".

Please advise which one is grammatically correct and natural, if none - I would appreciate suggestions. Thank you!

6
  • 3
    If passive is desired, then "He is expected to be fired" or even "It is believed that he may be fired." In both cases, the main clause is passive. Commented Apr 6, 2020 at 23:05
  • Thanks! The task concerned personal passive specifically, but if I were to choose either, 'it is believed' sounds more precise indeed. Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 7:17
  • We don't do anything with "may be": the sentence is: "People believe {that he may be fired}". {that he may be fired} is a noun clause - known as a content clause. This is the same as "People believe {X}" and "X" will remain the same. The simplest way is "{That he may be fired} is believed by people." but this, although correct, is not very idiomatic.
    – Greybeard
    Commented Jan 3, 2021 at 20:27
  • 1
    You can't make a complex sentence into a passive sentence. Complex sentences have several clauses and passivization can apply to any transitive clause, main or subordinate. Having a passive clause does not make a sentence passive unless it's the only clause in the sentence. Commented Jun 1, 2021 at 14:17
  • The received wisdom is that he'll be fired. Commented Jun 1, 2021 at 14:24

2 Answers 2

3

Once again, a few caveats, before we start:

  1. "Passive" applies to clauses, not sentences. Only simple sentences, without subordinate clauses, can be called "passive sentences", if the main and only clause is passive.
  2. Therefore, there is no "active mood" for a sentence to be in, and no "passive mood" that you can transform it into. That's not the way it works.

In a clause, application of the passive transformation requires a transitive verb with a subject and a direct object. The direct object is promoted to subject, and the original subject is out of a job. The main verb changes to a past participle and is preceded by some form of the auxiliary be; which form depends on whether it is preceded by some other auxiliary verb controlling its form.

In the sentence in the question

  • People believe [he may be fired].

the noun complement clause (that) he may be fired, the direct object of believe, is already passive. It's the passive of somebody may fire him. Note that it's followed the rule: past participle, form of be, subject thrown away, old object becomes subject.

The main clause

  • People believe [NP]

is transitive and may be passivized, producing

  • That he may be fired is believed by people.

Note that both clauses are passive. The that complementizer is usually optional, but it's required here because the that-clause begins the sentence (as the new subject).

However, no he will appear in the main clause, certainly not as subject; he occurs in the subordinate complement clause, and passive only operates inside its own clause. So there's no way passive can move a noun up one clause; there are rules that do that, but not passive.

0

Neither possibility is idiomatic and it seems that there is no way to use a modal as they are not use with "to". The following way of completing the sentence results in something with approximately the same meaning but there must be other means, perhaps more interesting, and you might try to see what you can do yourself along this line.

  • He is believed to be a legitimate target for a possible firing.

If we were to say "He is believed to be the target of a possible firing." (shorter) there would be insinuated that there are people considering the execution of this action.

Other examples

  • He is believed to incur the risk of being fired. (rather formal)

  • He is believed to be at risk of being fired. (appears to be somewhat contrived)

3
  • 1
    Yes, it seems like there are plenty of ways to rewrite this sentence in personal passive! Thank you! I wouldn't overcomplicate it though :) Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 7:20
  • He is believed to be at risk of being fired; in the risk of is much less idiomatic. See Ngrams. Commented Jun 1, 2021 at 15:26
  • @PeterShor I think so too (hardly idiomatic); I don't even need the confirmation given by the ngram to be persuaded (must not have been thinking when I wrote that). Thanks for catching it.
    – LPH
    Commented Jun 1, 2021 at 15:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .