0

I have been looking online for some good formal alternatives to 'does not' but I haven't found anything that seems ok.

It should fit in a sentence like this: "He doesn't have the ability to ...."

Thanks in advance.

7
  • 1
    He doesn't have the ability to fly -> He has no ability to fly -> He cannot fly
    – GEdgar
    Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 14:35
  • 1
    No worries. You may use does not in the most formal settings like court or contracts. Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 14:42
  • It's formal enough, but if you like, you can remove the negative as in "he lacks the ability".
    – oerkelens
    Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 14:46
  • 3
    Is there any particular reason why you're looking for an alternative to the phrase "does not"? The phrase "does not" certainly sounds fine in formal writing, so I can't think of why you'd want an alternative. Are you asking for a completely general alternative for "does not" which will work in any context, or are you specifically asking for an alternative way to say "he does not have the ability to ..."? Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 15:27
  • 1
    British stuffiness about 150 years ago. Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 16:12

2 Answers 2

1

What could be more formal than does not?

There isn't another phrase that means the same thing. So I think you're there.

0

He lacks the ability to ...

Or maybe something like

He does not appear to be qualified to ...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .