1

In this sentence I used it to refer to a variety mentioned a few words earlier, because I consider variety to be a collective noun which can be referred to in the singular. However, I'm not certain that the result actually reads that way: is it in my sentence actually referring unambiguously to the variety?

Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because it solidifies the bond between countries and offers wide range of choice to customers.

1
  • 3
    Hello, prog94. When you think about it, isn't it the shopkeepers' 'includ[ing] a variety of imported products' (and the fact that various exporters are obviously aware of this), rather than the actual cans, boxes, wedges, whatever, that give rise to a stronger relationship? 'It' refers to the nearest sensible/logical referent, here the shopkeepers' 'including' [/buying and stocking] a plethora of imported goods. Perhaps 'this' (hinting at 'this practice') is a better choice. Commented Jul 7, 2019 at 13:31

1 Answer 1

2

No, it's not unambiguous. It can be referring to either a variety or to shop vendors including a variety.

(My personal parsing would be to interpret it as referring to the action rather than to the noun, but that's subjective.)

To rephrase it to make it unambiguous, you have to drop the pronoun.

Here are some possibilities:

  1. Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because such a variety solidifies the bond between countries and offers a wide range of choice to customers.

  2. Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because doing so solidifies the bond between countries and offers a wide range of choice to customers.


Note that there is also a third variation of this sentence, one in which the use of it would have been not just ambiguous but inappropriate:

  1. Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because these products solidify the bond between countries and offer a wide range of choice to customers.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .