We have: "it takes two to tango", "two is company; three is a crowd", etc... Are there any similar sayings that refer to four people?

  • 1
    It's not English, but I quite like the Irish one: ceathrar cóisir, cúigear comhluadar “four’s a party, five’s a crowd”. Nov 24, 2014 at 19:05
  • 2
    The poem my grandmother used to quote to me went something like "Two's company/Three's a crowd/Four's too much/And five's not allowed"... but I can't seem to find a reference or the rest of it online. Nov 24, 2014 at 20:11
  • 1
    From Monty Python and the Holy Grail: Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out.
    – Barmar
    Nov 24, 2014 at 20:42
  • 1
    From¹ Orson Welles: “My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people.” Nov 25, 2014 at 0:33

3 Answers 3


Two is company three's a crowd. Four on a sidewalk is not allowed.

  • Hi Captain O, welcome to EL&U. Note, the system has flagged your post as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide a published example or a reference to this epithet, to prove that you haven't just made it up. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-) Feb 2, 2019 at 7:15

No. Not a very common one, at least.

The reason there are expressions for one, two, and three is because of the special status accorded to a couple in the culture where the expression originated.

So: there are lots of "one" expressions indicating that one person is not enough to have a one-on-one relationship. "Table for one." "One is the loneliest number."

There are "two" expressions, like "It takes two to tango," indicating that "two" is enough to have a one-on-one relationship.

There are "three" expressions, like "third wheel" or "three's a crowd," indicating that those people not in the one-on-one, couples, relationship, are extraneous. Three in this case stands for "more than two," and no special "four" or "five" expressions are needed.

The only think I can think of that even remotely qualifies is "fourth wheel," probably a back-formation from "third wheel." If you have three people, a couple and a single, at an event together, the couple may try to set up the single with a "fourth wheel" to keep him or her from being a "third wheel."

People talk about trying to find a "fourth" for bridge or golf, but that doesn't sound like what you're talking about. Similarly, the "Fourth Estate" is a group of people, but again, that's more specific than your examples.

To summarize: when it comes to idioms, any person more than two is a third, no matter how many of them there are.

  • I've read that there are some primitive societies that don't even have words for numbers higher than 3, they're all just lumped together as many.
    – Barmar
    Nov 24, 2014 at 20:45
  • @Barmar - "Many" is "three". More than that is "lots". (Source: Troll counting in the Discworld series by Terry Pratchett.)
    – AndyT
    Sep 26, 2017 at 14:27

Four is a party and Five is a mob. I read that in an old school textbook but I can't remember the name.

  • It would help to find a reference when posting answers like this. Sep 26, 2017 at 16:25
  • Digital Chris, with virtually the same response, used a 'comment' as he had no supporting reference. When you gain enough rep, you will be able to do likewise. Sep 26, 2017 at 16:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.