3

As a non-native English speaker, I sometimes feel my speech/texts sound or look weird. I am experiencing such a situation now.

I am trying to tell someone else I just read their document in a very quick way, got the main idea, and feel that it is not the document I exactly want.

I tried "I just read it roughly, just a thought, it does not look like what I want." This sounds unnatural to me.

Can it be fixed to sound more natural?

1
  • 1
    Better to say "I glanced at it" or "I looked at it briefly" or even "I took a look at it."
    – Robusto
    Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 14:18

2 Answers 2

3

roughly relates to quick estimates or drafts of a document (e.g. a proposal). What you want to give is a quick, first impression kind of reply.

There are different ways to say this.

At first glance, it doesn't seem to be what I want/need.

This implies, however, that you might give it a second glance. If you don't, you can try:

  • After skimming this, it's not quite what I want/need.
  • At a glance (or, I glanced at it;), it doesn't seem to be quite what I want/need.
  • I scanned this, but it's not exactly to be what I want/need.
  • I did look it over; it's not quite what I need.
1

Try using, "I skimmed the contents, and it's not what I had in mind."

Or

"I grazed the contents, and it's not what I had in mind."

2
  • 2
    Don't you mean 'browsed'? I've never come across an equivalent metaphorical use of 'graze'. Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 14:32
  • I agree with Edwin, grazed just isn't used that way. I'd even say "read roughly" is better.
    – Kevin
    Commented Mar 27, 2014 at 14:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.