7

I have been trying to find a word that describes a concept that is only defined by the lack for something. For example, there isn't really any such thing as cold, it is a concept we use to describe the lack of heat. So is there a word to describe the kind of word that "cold" is?

7
  • One could however see things alternatively: heat could be considered as the lack of inertia keeping molecules still. Interesting idea though. I'd be curious to see if there is a way of expressing this idea in a concise fashion.
    – James P.
    Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 13:17
  • 3
    @James: Er...from a physics point of view that suggestion is not particularly well founded. Inertia doesn't "keep [things] still" it keeps their momentum constant, which is a different thing. The distinction between heat and cold is a good one because there is a zero for temperature, and that represents the maximum "coldness". Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 13:55
  • 1
    Here's a link to a list of what I'm happy to call 'privatives'. It's pretty substantial, even though it's actually only concerned with those starting with the Greek a- and an- prefixes, and has a rider pointing out that only the 'significant' words are included... wordinfo.info/unit/2838/ip:1 Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 16:53
  • 1
    @dmckee: You're right about physics (been a while since I read through textbooks on the subject). What I meant to say is a cold objet is lacking caloric energy but it could be said to be "gaining" in terms of other properties. This is why I still feel it's a relative concept as is implied by the "lack of something", something being the point of reference.
    – James P.
    Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 17:56
  • 1
    Both privative and negative are good answers. We often have a negative definition (containing something like not, un-, etc.) of words that have a privative meaning (words that concern the removal or possibly the absence of something). Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 19:57

3 Answers 3

10

@Matt Ellen used the word privative in this sense in his (closed) question, Is the truth a privative?

He used the word as a noun and the link from his question to the word's definition at Dictionary.com does have this:

privative
-noun something that is deprived.

I'm not sure how common this usage is. NOAD has this:

privative |ˈpraɪvədɪv|
adjective
(of an action or state) marked by the absence, removal, or loss of some quality or attribute that is normally present.
• (of a statement or term) denoting the absence or loss of an attribute or quality : the wording of the privative clause.
• Grammar (of a particle or affix) expressing absence or negation, for example, the a- (from the alpha privative in Greek), meaning “not,” in atypical.

noun
a privative attribute, quality, or proposition.

5
  • I'm not sure if I've heard this word before - if so, only in the context of formal logic and philosophy. Of course, this doesn't mean it isn't a good word, but I would beware of overlapping with any technical definition.
    – Marcin
    Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 14:27
  • @Marcin: I seem to be familiar with this usage, though that may just be because I also read Matt's question recently. But the meaning seems pretty transparent anyway, and definitions & references abound on the net, so I'm not sure why you're wary of it. Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 16:48
  • :-D I was about to come and say! Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 16:53
  • 2
    Even Terry Pratchett used it ('knurd' being what you are after too much coffee and not enough alcohol IIRC), so I don't think it's too technical. Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 16:55
  • @TimLyminton: Thank you so so so so so so much. I have been looking for where I found the definition of privative that I used in my question. It's in The Science of Discworld! Which, by chance, also points out that the truth is a privative :D Commented Jun 5, 2011 at 17:04
3

I would describe this as a "negative concept", or "negative definition", in the same fashion (and by analogy with) a negative right.

1

Via negativa might be the word(s) you're looking for. A quick Google search brings up: "a way of describing something by saying what it is not." It is from Latin, normally used to describe God. e.g. infinite is a word or concept which denies that the finiteness of something. Per your example, cold is a concept used to describe temperature via negativa, by negating the presence of heat.

1
  • Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
    – NVZ
    Commented Jan 8, 2017 at 3:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .