Skip to main content
deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
RegDwigнt
  • 97.6k
  • 40
  • 312
  • 406

Sentence Grammar "Had been engaged when they married" vs. "were married" vs. "had married"

Which of the sentences below are grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they married.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married.

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

  1. The couple had been engaged for five years when they married. 2. The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married. 3. The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

Only (1) sounds correct to me, but I am unable to explain why (2) and (3) are grammatically wrong.

Sentence Grammar

Which of the sentences below are grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they married.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married.

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

Only (1) sounds correct to me, but I am unable to explain why (2) and (3) are grammatically wrong.

"Had been engaged when they married" vs. "were married" vs. "had married"

Which of the sentences below are grammatically correct?

  1. The couple had been engaged for five years when they married. 2. The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married. 3. The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

Only (1) sounds correct to me, but I am unable to explain why (2) and (3) are grammatically wrong.

Post Reopened by user10893
deleted 792 characters in body
Source Link
Alex
  • 121
  • 2
  • 4
  • 11

Which of the two sentences below isare grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married they married.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had marriedthey were married.

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

Only (1) sounds correct to me, but I am unable to explain why (2) and (3) are grammatically wrong.

Which of the two sentences below is grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married (2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married

Which of the sentences below are grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they married.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married.

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married.

Only (1) sounds correct to me, but I am unable to explain why (2) and (3) are grammatically wrong.

deleted 792 characters in body
Source Link
Alex
  • 121
  • 2
  • 4
  • 11

Please help to correct the grammar inWhich of the two sentences below: is grammatically correct?

(1) The couple have been engaged since the summer – they are still engaged now; used 'have' instead of 'has' considering the word couple as plural.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married — used 'had been' to indicate the state of being before another event (marriage) in the past; not sure if use of words "were married" is grammatically correct in this sentence. Should it be "had married"?

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years before they gotwere married – same meaning as   (2) but used simple past (got married)

(4) The couple had been engaged for five years beforewhen they married last year – same meaning as (2) but used simple past with time (last year)

(5) Kate Winslet has been married to James Threapleton (left) and to director Sam Mendes (right) (Reuters) – this is a caption in a news article. Why was present perfect used when she is no longerhad married to those people now?

Please help to correct the grammar in the sentences below:

(1) The couple have been engaged since the summer – they are still engaged now; used 'have' instead of 'has' considering the word couple as plural.

(2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married — used 'had been' to indicate the state of being before another event (marriage) in the past; not sure if use of words "were married" is grammatically correct in this sentence. Should it be "had married"?

(3) The couple had been engaged for five years before they got married – same meaning as (2) but used simple past (got married)

(4) The couple had been engaged for five years before they married last year – same meaning as (2) but used simple past with time (last year)

(5) Kate Winslet has been married to James Threapleton (left) and to director Sam Mendes (right) (Reuters) – this is a caption in a news article. Why was present perfect used when she is no longer married to those people now?

Which of the two sentences below is grammatically correct?

(1) The couple had been engaged for five years when they were married  (2) The couple had been engaged for five years when they had married

Post Closed as "off topic" by user10893
Source Link
Alex
  • 121
  • 2
  • 4
  • 11
Loading