Timeline for Why is/are there tens of thousands of dead women and children? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23 at 1:31 | history | left closed in review |
fev Yosef Baskin jimm101 |
Duplicate | |
May 22 at 12:30 | review | Reopen votes | |||
May 23 at 1:31 | |||||
May 22 at 12:29 | comment | added | Araucaria - Him | In constructions which have the dummy word there as subject, the verb usually agree with the noun phrase to its right. So, here that would be the plural form are. However, in speech (and in some not very formal writing) it is grammatical in modern English to use singular agreement in such cases as long as the verb is cliticised onto the subject - in other words as long as we see "There's two" and not "There is two". | |
May 21 at 9:42 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | See Why are there more of them ... vs Why is there more of them ..., itself closed as a duplicate of There are so many ... vs There is so many ... (with a nod to 'There's so many ....'). | |
May 21 at 7:40 | history | closed |
Gio KillingTime Chenmunka |
Duplicate of Which sentence is correct and why (is VS are) [duplicate] | |
May 21 at 7:18 | review | Close votes | |||
May 21 at 7:40 | |||||
May 21 at 6:53 | comment | added | Gio | “Tens of thousands … looks plural! | |
May 21 at 3:06 | history | asked | ronald christenkkson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |