Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 159 characters in body
Source Link

A student is responsible for collecting sheets handed out in class for those students who are absent. This is what is often said to me as I'm handing out the sheets. I've always corrected my studentsthem by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (a native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)

I've always corrected my students by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (a native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)

A student is responsible for collecting sheets handed out in class for those students who are absent. This is what is often said to me as I'm handing out the sheets. I've always corrected them by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (a native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)

added 1 character in body
Source Link
KillingTime
  • 6.3k
  • 76
  • 35
  • 40

I've always corrected my students by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (nativea native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

"I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)"

I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)

I've always corrected my students by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

"I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)"

I've always corrected my students by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (a native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)

Source Link

I would need 3 more sheets. (of paper)

I've always corrected my students by stating that "need" is a state verb and in this instance should be in the simple present. It's an immediate need.

My colleague (native-speaker), however, just argued that you could very well say "would need" in this context.

Is "would need" acceptable in this context and is the reason because it's conditional?

"I would need 3 more sheets (because 3 students are missing and I have to put 3 in the missing-student's binder for them.)"